Scuttle
Well-Known Member
Even if it is it still doesn’t make sense. It’s not like the attic is clear and open and doesn’t have portraits and hundreds of other things everywhere.Isn’t the area outside the attic at MK an emergency exit?
Even if it is it still doesn’t make sense. It’s not like the attic is clear and open and doesn’t have portraits and hundreds of other things everywhere.Isn’t the area outside the attic at MK an emergency exit?
Also, no post processing done on the pictures so far as you can do a ton of heavy lifting once you have the raw file to play with. I don't have many pictures of mine with me at the office; but, did have this one of DL's HBG from Haunted Mansion Holiday to give an example of how far you can push the raw data and how a digital image as captured can vary so much. This was with my D800e at ISO 1600 captured, which was that camera's sweet spot for dynamic range. It was where that camera's sensor stopped applying gain via analog current and started using digital post processing to boost ISO. If you are shooting raw and plan on taking it thorough post processing, it's always best to stay below the point of sacrificing real data. My D850 stays at ISO 400 and can pull out even more detail than this.Those two photos were not shot under similar conditions. The DL photo was a press photo taken by Disney on a tripod after-hours while the attraction was down and show lighting could be altered for optimal documentation. The WDW photo was taken by a guest from a moving Doombuggy this morning while the attraction was operating. I don't say that to diss the WDW photo at all, they're just not the same kind of picture.
People are reading way too much into how the lighting looks on camera - lighting registers differently in different cameras, lenses, settings, and circumstances. The small smattering of pictures taken this morning alone shows how widely the results can vary from device to device.
Reports say it looks good in person and isn't too bright. Given how finely calibrated the light needs to be for this effect to work, I would say it's fair to trust that.
I don't claim to be an insider. I have known a lot about this specific project and have shared a good amount about it online before anybody else. My posting history speaks for itself if you'd like to check it, there's plenty in this thread alone.Why? Because of an emergency exit? Give us some substance and stop pretending to be an insider that signed an NDA.
Yeah, although most of them are not able to post publicly anymore for various reasons.Has there even been legit insiders on here since Spirit left and Lee has been MIA? Is Raven even around anymore?
This has nothing to do with the movie. He's been in real talks to come to WDW ever since his successful reveal in 2015 at DL. At one point he was nearly a 50th Anniversary present for WDW, in which case he would have debuted before the new movie even started filming.You'd think given how long it took to install it, they'd at least reflect on placement But nope, they ruined the ride flow (eerie and moody with ghosts not outright seen until leota, giving credence to the story that her magic words are what makes you start seeing into that world clearly). And all because of a movie that flopped.
This is once again them being more worried about tieins than actual cohesion and story. Even though so far this approach keeps failing
Diagrams aren’t actual sets of drawings. They’re not going to give you much.View attachment 756861View attachment 756862
For reference...and to continue speculating as to why the Hatbox Ghost couldn't go in the same place! I don't actually care, but I thought these maps might be interesting to look at!
And Iger just claimed how committed to storytelling they are…You'd think given how long it took to install it, they'd at least reflect on placement But nope, they ruined the ride flow (eerie and moody with ghosts not outright seen until leota, giving credence to the story that her magic words are what makes you start seeing into that world clearly). And all because of a movie that flopped.
This is once again them being more worried about tieins than actual cohesion and story. Even though so far this approach keeps failing
This has nothing to do with the movie. He's been in real talks to come to WDW ever since his successful reveal in 2015 at DL. At one point he was nearly a 50th Anniversary present for WDW, in which case he would have debuted before the new movie even started filming.
Notice how the figure resembles both the 1969 and 2015 DL originals far more than he does the redesigned version from the movie. It isn't a tie in.
I believe he was actually part of the original marketing plans for the 50th anniversary, right? 50 enhancements and this was planned to be one. COVID caused that idea to be scrapped and for improvements to be scrapped or delayed.This has nothing to do with the movie. He's been in real talks to come to WDW ever since his successful reveal in 2015 at DL. At one point he was nearly a 50th Anniversary present for WDW, in which case he would have debuted before the new movie even started filming.
Notice how the figure resembles both the 1969 and 2015 DL originals far more than he does the redesigned version from the movie. It isn't a tie in.
Not to dogpile on the negativity, but its placement looks about as bad as anticipated.
Still thing the whole effect looks looks bad, would have rather this stayed a legend
See, Bob Iger fixed the parks!Gotta say I'm shocked that as of 10:00 Haunted Mansion is a walk on.
a Hatbox taker and a Care Ghost?I'm still open to having the caretaker and Hatbox Ghost switch spots to see if that would look better.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.