Disneyhead'71
Well-Known Member
Disney ParksTheme does not equal Brand.
Does going to a 'Brand Park' sound like fun?
Disney ParksTheme does not equal Brand.
Does going to a 'Brand Park' sound like fun?
Theme does not equal Brand.
Does going to a 'Brand Park' sound like fun?
And the thing is, they could easily silence all the "Splash Mountain is racist" if they just did a VERY carefully marketed re-release, perhaps with a bonus feature hosted by Leonard Maltin featuring various African-Americans who don't have a problem with it. Then, people would watch it, realize the the animated bits are cool, the live-action bits are kind of boring, and there's no real malice otherwise.
perhaps with a bonus feature hosted by Leonard Maltin featuring various African-Americans who don't have a problem with it.
featuring various African-Americans who don't have a problem with it.
Can we please end this SotS discussion and get back on topic?
Yes, if anyone here wants to know more about the movie, then read this book and take the discussion to another thread. https://www.amazon.com/Afraid-South-Forbidden-Disney-Stories-ebook/dp/B00AG6G250Can we please end this SotS discussion and get back on topic?
Disney Parks
Universal is without a doubt IP based. But it is really not all about wallowing in the Universal brand. Particularly since their biggest IP is Warner Brothers, Simpsons is FOX, Transformers is Paramount, Terminator is Orion, Men In Black is Columbia, Kong is Radio Pictures, The Grinch is CBS, and Spider-man and The Hulk are Disney.And Universal...
Dis is coasting on when they used to be themed, but is rapidly moving towards the Universal model.
Universal is without a doubt IP based. But it is really not all about wallowing in the Universal brand. Particularly since their biggest IP is Warner Brothers, Simpsons is FOX, Transformers is Paramount, Terminator is Orion, Men In Black is Columbia, Kong is Radio Pictures, The Grinch is CBS, and Spider-man and The Hulk are Disney.
Universal have become masters of merchandising, this is true. But they have become better at theming and place making. Disney on the other hand appears to have completely given up. Frozen obviously belongs in Fantasyland. Avatar at DHS. GotG at DHS. Inside Out and Big Hero 6 could both work at Epcot. But Disney doesn't think like that anymore. The only reason Arendale invaded Norway was to drag some of the Princess crowd OUT of Fantasyland.I know, but it's coming. Uni lacked the brand density of Dis, but just because they didn't have their own doesn't mean it's not a branded experience. Not to mention from Illumination to Dreamworks plus their big year last year, it's coming just the same. Fast and the Furious and Jimmy Fallon is the start of that change of focusing on their own brand.
For the past 5-7 years everyone wanted Disney Parks to be more like Universal's recent run, but I fear no one realized the direction Universal has taken us. Disregard for original attractions, shirking of history, quick turnover with the hottest IP. All about the merch sales. It's the new model and it is clearing not meshing well with long time Disney fans.
Just because Universal started on the 'dark side' of IP, doesn't excuse every action they make. At the same time Disney has basically ruined the way the studios run. Every studio wants to be Dis and every studio is rapidly trying to start their own 'brands'.
And to be clear, I've largely enjoyed Universal Parks as of late. But you have to be on board a train heading in a very different direction.
The only reason Arendale invaded Norway was to drag some of the Princess crowd OUT of Fantasyland.
You can't do Food and Wine festival 365 days per yearThat and a desperate need to boost Epcots numbers.
You can't do Food and Wine festival 365 days per year
I didn't even think of that. I'll be going down to the world this December after not being there for a few years. I wonder if I'll be shocked on the state of EPCOTOf course not.
That's why we have the Flower & Garden Festival.
Every studio wants their own Cinematic Universe. WB's doing it with DC, Legendary's doing it with giant monsters, and Universal wants to do it with the Classic Monsters. Chasing that Marvel money.I know, but it's coming. Uni lacked the brand density of Dis, but just because they didn't have their own doesn't mean it's not a branded experience. Not to mention from Illumination to Dreamworks plus their big year last year, it's coming just the same. Fast and the Furious and Jimmy Fallon is the start of that change of focusing on their own brand.
For the past 5-7 years everyone wanted Disney Parks to be more like Universal's recent run, but I fear no one realized the direction Universal has taken us. Disregard for original attractions, shirking of history, quick turnover with the hottest IP. All about the merch sales. It's the new model and it is clearing not meshing well with long time Disney fans.
Just because Universal started on the 'dark side' of IP, doesn't excuse every action they make. At the same time Disney has basically ruined the way the studios run. Every studio wants to be Dis and every studio is rapidly trying to start their own 'brands'.
And to be clear, I've largely enjoyed Universal Parks as of late. But you have to be on board a train heading in a very different direction.
I agree but I do think Avatar is fine for AK. I wouldn't want Inside Out to come at the cost of Figment. Put it in the 3D theater. BH6 might as well go in WoL so we can have a little "Not-Marvel" Land in WDWUniversal have become masters of merchandising, this is true. But they have become better at theming and place making. Disney on the other hand appears to have completely given up. Frozen obviously belongs in Fantasyland. Avatar at DHS. GotG at DHS. Inside Out and Big Hero 6 could both work at Epcot. But Disney doesn't think like that anymore. The only reason Arendale invaded Norway was to drag some of the Princess crowd OUT of Fantasyland.
You are jumping into your own "Jolly holiday"Mary Poppins Tower of Terror.
I like it.
Can we please end this SotS discussion and get back on topic?
I agree but I do think Avatar is fine for AK. I wouldn't want Inside Out to come at the cost of Figment. Put it in the 3D theater. BH6 might as well go in WoL so we can have a little "Not-Marvel" Land in WDW
I'm OK with Avatar as well. Of course I would rather be Crazy over the moon excited about something going into a park. But hey thats how it is now, "Well I can see how it would work." The days of them adding a beastly kingdom or Australia Because it would be a perfect fit for AK are sadly over.I agree but I do think Avatar is fine for AK. I wouldn't want Inside Out to come at the cost of Figment. Put it in the 3D theater. BH6 might as well go in WoL so we can have a little "Not-Marvel" Land in WDW
Same here, You forgot driving REALLY BIG CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT for things boys dreamed of doing, When I was a kid I had a Tonka Backhoe, Now I have the real thing by Case... (and I STILL have the Tonka one ) Boys never outgrow their toys...
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.