And that is a statement not an explanation.Well that's DINOSAUR. Not Jurassic Park.
And that is a statement not an explanation.Well that's DINOSAUR. Not Jurassic Park.
Clearly you do notI understand it perfectly. And I hope most of you eventually will too....
And that is a statement not an explanation.
So using science to bring back an extinct dinosaur is not ok but using science to create a time machine to go back in time and bring back an extinct dinosaur is ok?It's both
I will takeIt's both
Can we petition that Pam's username be changed to Pam Hates Everything.Hmmm. I would say visiting it multiple times in my life counts as understanding the theme park. I have rode every single ride. And my least favorite..... Flight of Passage. Why? I am on a Chuck-E-Cheese ride looking at a giant screen with my 3D glasses.
When the Frozen to Norway rumors were just that, there was also the Ratatouille to France rumors going on. The consensus on here was that they should have been announced together. Ratatouille will be the best fit of the three IP inspired rides in World Showcase (although a Coco overlay would be better than Rat). Ratatouille at least pays reference to something significant to French culture (their food) and includes French visuals. Gran Fiesta Tour hits on cultural aspects as well, but most of that was El Rio del Tiempo and not the overlay. Frozen Ever After has nothing to do with Norway. Had they taken a similar story approach to Frozen Ever After as they did to Royal Sommerhus it may have been more acceptable for the park. Instead they built a ride that belongs in Fantasyland as we all feared.Nailed it. But we could say that about a few things besides Pandora where some are concerned. Just like some people criticizing Disney Springs would eat up the restaurants and shops if Universal were building them. Or if say Rat weren't a movie and the imagineers came up with a fun romp around a Paris kitchen featuring a rat.
It's been my argument since the initial announcement, and their execution on the thematic elements/story treatment were flawless. That doesn't mean the rides are perfect, but the thematic fit is better than a direct lift of Mysterious Island would have been.That's actually an interesting thought. Imagine this land without the film attached...
I am a big Pandora fan too (not the film). I think thematically it fits AK much better than some of these other IP additions the parks are getting.
When the Frozen to Norway rumors were just that, there was also the Ratatouille to France rumors going on. The consensus on here was that they should have been announced together. Ratatouille will be the best fit of the three IP inspired rides in World Showcase (although a Coco overlay would be better than Rat). Ratatouille at least pays reference to something significant to French culture (their food) and includes French visuals. Gran Fiesta Tour hits on cultural aspects as well, but most of that was El Rio del Tiempo and not the overlay. Frozen Ever After has nothing to do with Norway. Had they taken a similar story approach to Frozen Ever After as they did to Royal Sommerhus it may have been more acceptable for the park. Instead they built a ride that belongs in Fantasyland as we all feared.
There is a Guardians treatment that DOES fit in Epcot and in EPCOT Center. When these rumors were circulating on here, myself and others suggested that Peter Quill very likely went to EPCOT Center as a kid. The problem becomes if that's nothing more than lip service. There is a treatment that can work, it's just a matter of whether or not they do it. Frozen Ever After tells me they won't do it, but Rohde being in charge of Marvel gives me hope.I think Disney is under the impression that we just like EPCOT Center for the 80's aspect, and what is their big modern 80's property? GotG.
This is the dumbest idea I've ever heard from Disney. And this is only happening because Epcot has nothing for the summer season (or MK for that matter).
Some themes in the Animal Kingdom (bolded is Disney language, unbolded is my narrative):It's Disney's Animal Kingdom. Not Disney's Alien Kingdom...
I didn't like the idea for that area anyway. Why? This is Disney's Animal Kingdom. Not Disney's Mystical Creature Kingdom.
Maybe if they added strobe lights over any dinosaurs that would be a better thematic experience.Dragons are mythical animals.
I can understand if you don't like the land ( i was unimpressed ). I just don't see how you can say the idea doesn't fit in with the theme of the park as a whole.Guys, I'm sorry if my opinion disturbs you all in any way shape or form. Let it go. (no frozen intended) I'm not a fan of Avatar Land.
So using science to bring back an extinct dinosaur is not ok but using science to create a time machine to go back in time and bring back an extinct dinosaur is ok?
It would certainly make @MisterPenguin feel a lot better. Or how about Pam Hates Everything Except Cars Land?Can we petition that Pam's username be changed to Pam Hates Everything.
Animal Kingdom's Dedication, April 22, 1998This is Disney's Animal Kingdom. Not Disney's Mystical Creature Kingdom.
Penguins don't wear shoes.If only Disney had produced Happy feet. That would have been a shoe in at DAK.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.