lazyboy97o
Well-Known Member
Fairly standard for show to be behind in theme park projects.Honestly, this far in, if there's not concrete decisions and a very good idea about what this ride will be inside Imagineering, I'd be very concerned lol.
Fairly standard for show to be behind in theme park projects.Honestly, this far in, if there's not concrete decisions and a very good idea about what this ride will be inside Imagineering, I'd be very concerned lol.
but not behind building the structure... They have to know what they are going to need long before any dirt starts moving... Fine tuning and tweaking may not be completely figured, but you can bet just about everything else has already been figured, ordered and already in fabrication.Fairly standard for show to be behind in theme park projects.
No, they do not need to know and fabrication for many, many elements does not start with the building.but not behind building the structure... They have to know what they are going to need long before any dirt starts moving... Fine tuning and tweaking may not be completely figured, but you can bet just about everything else has already been figured, ordered and already in fabrication.
Interesting. I guess they get column spacing, clear heights and make all the show fit those constraints? Sorta makes sense, they can tweak designs, VE and etc., while still erecting structure. I'd imagine all the Structural team would need regarding show elements are floor loads.Fairly standard for show to be behind in theme park projects.
Nope. They don't order colored panels just to paint them.Not painting it?
Which things...? Raising prices? Cutting entertainment? Homogenizing food offerings? $35 t-shirts?
Obviously subjective, but I'd much rather have a go-away-paneled box than this monstrosity in Epcot.This seems like a moot point, because I'd still be mad at Disney if this very same building was being used to house a new 300 Million Dollar Figment E-Ticket. This building is beneath the standard of the company and the park. The fact that I'm not a fan of Guardians and don't think it fits in Epcot doesn't do anything to improve my opinion, but I don't think Disney would be justified in building this warehouse regardless of what was inside it.
The Guardians movies certainly doesn't lack for interesting architecture to be inspired by - there of plenty of buildings in Xandar that could at least visually work well in Future World. Remember when we thought the Show Building was going to be themed like this?:
That's not how I dream of Future World looking, but it's better than the world's tallest IKEA.
The track is known but the show scenes and sets are not finalized. It’s really nothing unusual for attractions. Utilization of a fast-track project delivery is very much the norm.Wait, what?
Are people trying to tell us that they built a box without knowing the track configuration that would be inhabiting it?
I find this doubtful.
I believe the entire track layout, and dimensions were a known - and the box is the - well, box - that covers it.
Your metric for success is, "I didn't pass out" at the sight of it. You continue to subscribe to the fallacy that any person who disagrees with this buildings design is either severely overreacting or yearns for Epcot to return to 1985. You can not simply over exagerate a differing opinion to suit your response.I'm with you. If there was something cool and architecturally interesting that would 1) satisfy the GotG theme, AND 2) fit with the skyline, I would MUCH prefer that to a giant go-away box!
Since I can't envision what would fit 1) and 2), AND since I've seen it in person and didn't pass out as a result of the sight lines, I'm not prepared to say they went the wrong way here, necessarily
I would think given the timeline, there is nothing about this build which is fast-tracked.The track is known but the show scenes and sets are not finalized. It’s really nothing unusual for attractions. Utilization of a fast-track project delivery is very much the norm.
Fast-track is a project delivery process, not a timeline.I would think given the timeline, there is nothing about this build which is fast-tracked.
They had to redesign everything to omit the half dozen gigantic Dave Bautista animatronics.The track is known but the show scenes and sets are not finalized. It’s really nothing unusual for attractions. Utilization of a fast-track project delivery is very much the norm.
Goodness. I was joking around. It's better than "I didn't pass out". It did not bother me whatsoever in the skyline of Epcot. As to the rest of your post, it sounds like you're selectively reading mine -- I'll just leave it at that.Your metric for success is, "I didn't pass out" at the sight of it. You continue to subscribe to the fallacy that any person who disagrees with this buildings design is either severely overreacting or yearns for Epcot to return to 1985. You can not simply over exagerate a differing opinion to suit your response.
And adding "is in the eye of the beholder" to an adjective does not equate an educated (or constructive) rebuttal.
In no effort to be "selective", above is another quote from the same response. Youre not prepared to say they went the wrong way...necessarily. Only Nostradamus himself could be more vague and widespread.I'm not prepared to say they went the wrong way here, necessarily.
Would anything in the skyline bother you?Goodness. I was joking around. It's better than "I didn't pass out". It did not bother me whatsoever in the skyline of Epcot. As to the rest of your post, it sounds like you're selectively reading mine -- I'll just leave it at that.
Omg chill. Newsflash, it's there and not going away anytime soon.Your metric for success is, "I didn't pass out" at the sight of it. You continue to subscribe to the fallacy that any person who disagrees with this buildings design is either severely overreacting or yearns for Epcot to return to 1985. You can not simply over exagerate a differing opinion to suit your response.
And adding "is in the eye of the beholder" to an adjective does not equate an educated (or constructive) rebuttal.
Merely a reference to a similar situation of wanting to kill the past and yet still constantly paying lip service. Either do it or don’t. It’s that simple.Don’t get me ranting about that again...
Yup. That monstrosity posted above, as one example. That would be worse than go-away panels. As I said.Would anything in the skyline bother you?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.