This backstory would come from Joe Rhode and his team. The convoluted backstories that explain these additions betrays arguments of a thematic fit.Coming from arguably the world-leading company in themed entertainment, that "Peter Quill visited Epcot as a child" contrived backstory excuse is embarrassing. It shows a complete lack of understanding of what theme is. Bob Chapek makes himself look like a total idiot, unqualified for the position he holds.
If he had nothing better, he shouldn't have tried to forge a connection at all.
Then please do share how Disney’s direction is philosophically different.And the most scholarly of reply's! I would much enjoy the chance to discuss the finer details of Six Flags themeing with you good Sir, if you wish!
Couldn't agree more, my memories from March 1983 will be harder to invoke in the new world order that is IPCOT.
It was an odd angle. "True to the original vision" and all that. I half expected him to say "...so don't worry, it's not Guardians."Did anyone else want to punch Chapek in the face when he said adding Guardians of the Galaxy would make Epcot more "Disney"?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.