BaconPancakes
Well-Known Member
If human beings were honest and didn't abuse systems then none of this would be needed
It wasn't the abusers though, it was the mass amount of people with disabilities who were taking advantage.
If human beings were honest and didn't abuse systems then none of this would be needed
Didn't know that, thanks. Then what is the basis of the lawsuit, people have to wait now?
"Doubtful that Disney will be held to a higher standard than other venues are to be considered ADA compliant. My gut is leading me to lean in the direction that this lawsuit might indeed backfire. It would be easier for Disney to not allow any guests special privileges beyond accessible and inclusive and wean away from the catalyst type considerations as re-entry, extra FP's and shortened wait times across the board as they are the fuel of the lawsuit and totally unnecessary in Disney being compliant. If Disney is going to be characturized as favoring one disability over another it would best to streamline compliance and omit all the other catalyst considerations. No guests awarded unless a particular attraction was constructed not to be accessible. Sometimes humans just push so hard that it backfires."
25% HA! they get 33% where I am from.Lawyers love stuff like this....they get 25% of the take.
So if there are 1000 plaintiffs and the award is 1 Million.
The lawyer gets $ 250,000.00
Each plaintiff then gets $ 750.00
View attachment 36040
This is the exact reason the lawsuit is such a bad idea. You end up hurting the very people you claim to be defending. Any business going forward now has to consider one of these potential lawsuits. It will result in people doing exactly what is required by law and not a bit more instead of doing what they feel is right or what they feel would be best for their guests. Just sad.....I definitely agree with your statement that too much pushing can lead to a negative outcome. I do civil engineering and construction for 'a living' ...and at the advent of the ADA Laws ...a few clients I worked with were some of the major oil companies / gas station owners. As you may recall, gas stations always had public / customer usable restrooms. When ADA kicked in ....ALL those gas stations were required to upgrade the restrooms to be ADA compliant. When you have 20,000 gas stations ....that's a sizable undertaking with an equally sizable price tag. So ...what did the oil companies do? They got rid of the restrooms...period. They had one ...internal restroom for employee use only ...and the public got none ...because there is no requirement to HAVE to give restroom access to anyone but an employee.
....Disney has no obligation to go above and beyond ....and if they are backed into a corner ...they may change their attitude about any special accommodation.
It is sad. Disney went above and beyond the call of duty catering to the disabled (especially those with invisible disabilities) and this is what they get in return (other than abuse of the system). "No good deed goes unpunished".This is the exact reason the lawsuit is such a bad idea. You end up hurting the very people you claim to be defending. Any business going forward now has to consider one of these potential lawsuits. It will result in people doing exactly what is required by law and not a bit more instead of doing what they feel is right or what they feel would be best for their guests. Just sad.
It is sad. Disney went above and beyond the call of duty catering to the disabled (especially those with invisible disabilities) and this is what they get in return (other than abuse of the system). "No good deed goes unpunished".
It wasn't the abusers though, it was the mass amount of people with disabilities who were taking advantage.
The blame for the lawsuit falls squarely on the shoulders of the lawyers....
As far as Autism Hippie concerned, she is not the instigator to the lawsuit, she just had herself added to the class action. And yes as some have pointed out their chances of actually proving that Disney was breaking any ADA requirements is slim, because the DAS still meets the level of reasonable accommodation, whereas the GAC was clearly a benefit that went beyond meeting basic needs and basic access. Their goal is an obvious attempt to shame Disney into some kind of reversal.
From what I've heard/read GAC "abuse" was a much bigger issue at Disneyland than at Florida.
Edit: specifically the problem of local card-owners lending their cards to friends/family.
The blame for the lawsuit falls squarely on the shoulders of the lawyers.
They don't give a rat's about the kids, all they want is money.
That's part of the problem nobody but Disney really knows, and quite honestly its hard to tell how much they were tracking it. A lot of the posts in here on both sides are based on anecdotal evidence, or someone claiming to have numbers from a CM etc. But either way there was an issue at both resorts, and from all reports at Disneyland the problem was associated with AP's getting a GAC even though they didn't need one because it was so easy
A lawsuit has been filed. Time to pass the story onto people who can bring attention to it.
Hilarious!!Waiting for the new ambulance chaser phone number on TV...
"1-800-SUE-WALT"
"Have your mouse ears irritated your head?"
"Are you the least bit upset about DAS?"
"Are you upset with the color of a Princess's shoes?"
"Did Mickey FAIL to show up at your Hotel and serve your child breakfast in bed?"
Call 1-800-SUE-WALT, so we can get rich off every petty grievance you can envision!
We also sue doctors, neighbors, relatives, all major religious institutions, cats, dogs, the guy who stopped to help you on the freeway, NASCAR (just because they exist), god (all of them), innocent people with ugly hairdo's, fat people, skinny people, kids who climb on rocks... tough kids, sissy kids, even kids with chicken pox...
Are we sure a lawsuit has already been filed? There's no mention anywhere on Google News, and there are plenty of docket tracking services that would have picked something like this up almost immediately since all federal and many state court dockets are online.
Is there any of particular reason why parents of autistic children have been the most vocal opponents of the new system?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.