Really? Ok here you go:
Not every park gets the same stuff. Tokyo getting Scandinavia doesn't mean wdw is 'getting the shaft'.
Tokyo is not getting Carsland, Paris, Avatarland, is Tokyo getting the shaft too?
I literally can't understand what kind of logic you're going for. Tokyo doesn't NEED Cars Land, Rats or Avatar and no one was saying they were. You obviously have never been to TDR - if you saw the level both of their parks are at, you wouldn't even be trying to make this point. Here we are comparing and contrasting two projects:
- Frozen overlay of Maelstrom in Epcot (WDW)
- New Scandinavian port with at least one major Frozen E Ticket in Tokyo DisneySea (TDR)
One of these projects is a cheap and quick overlay on an existing ride without changing the ride system or layout - just redressing the scenes and installing new ones (hence the term overlay). The other is a $400 million+ land with multiple attractions, shops and restaurants centered around Frozen.
As a point of comparison, the port of Scandinavia for TDS will cost more than WDW's entire New Fantasyland expansion.
We're getting a low capacity low budget redo that's thematically dubious at best. TDR is getting a top of the line land that looks every bit as beautiful, detailed and immersive as Cars Land, and reliable insiders have indicated the marquee attraction is going to be cutting edge and very expensive.
WDW is getting the shaft on Frozen, and fans and shareholders alike should be livid that Disney is squandering their most valuable original IP in decades at their flagship resort and not exploiting it to its full money-minting potential.
Disney knows a Maelstrom overlay is good enough for WDW guests, and that they will just love it. So why bother spending more and doing the job right? Frozenstrom will pack 'em in for a fraction of the price.
After they spend all day waiting in line for Frozenstrom, they can then use their FP+ to see a 17 year old nighttime show.