From the OS: Gator drags child into Seven Seas Lagoon

Status
Not open for further replies.

Daveeeeed

Well-Known Member
The signs do forbid guests from entering the lagoon. If it's not ok for an adult to swim in it during the day what makes it ok for an infant to do it alone at night? The water was deep enough for the child to drown in (1ft)
That is not no swimming water, no swimming water is more like 3 and 1/2 feet where you can actually swim in. Still they shouldn't have let him, but it is still Partly Disney's fault by not having signs posted of wildlife WHEN THEY KNEW there were gators. That is what I am frustrated about. This could have been prevented.

Jeff Quattroochi, an expert with alligators has said that of course people know there are gators in Florida, but if you are from the Mid-West or someplace like that you really have to be reminded of the possibility in every lake, because Disney knew there were alligators they needed to be some posting.
 

21stamps

Well-Known Member
It's not even 9 now and as I look to the shallowest part of the lake in my back yard I can't see any part of the lake floor. I'm just saying, who lets their infant alone in such a swamp like that while they sit far away preoccupied watching a movie?
Is your lake zero entry?
 

Incomudro

Well-Known Member
It's not even 9 now and as I look to the shallowest part of the lake in my back yard I can't see any part of the lake floor. I'm just saying, who lets their infant alone in such a swamp like that while they sit far away preoccupied watching a movie?
The kid wasn't alone in a swamp.
He was at the beach of the Grand Floridian on movie night, and according to reports - his father was right there with him.
 

jaklgreen

Well-Known Member
This family is from the same community as me. It is beyond horrible. It is all over our local news with pictures of that poor little boy and his family. They are talking to their neighbors, etc. We can't get away from it. I do not blame the parents. I know a lot of people go near the water thinking it is safe. I do not think that just because someone is from NE, or any other state that does not have gators is a good enough excuse to not do your due diligence when travelling somewhere. Maybe I am an over planner but I have been going to WDW for 20 years and have always know about the gators and look sideways at the water as we walk by. But I understand that not everyone does that and kind of goes with the flow type of thing. I am also kind of surprised at how many different interpretations of what "No Swimming" means. For us, no swimming has always meant do not go in the water because if not swimming, then what is the reason to go into the water. You are not going to bathe in it. Seven Seas lagoon is something we never went close to and made sure our kids never went near it. Not just because of the gator issue but that water is f..ing disgusting! It is dirty, has oil and diesel from the boats in it and it smells. I also cringe when I see people in it. I think that since people think the no swimming can mean its OK to wade in it then Disney should put better signs up warning not to go near the water. Even though I do not blame Disney either, I think it would be a good idea for them to give everyone information about the wildlife when they check into the hotels. This can include the dangers and also the no feeding policy. Sometimes you have to save people from themselves. I think this is just a freak accident. Could it have been avoided? Of course, by a million different ways. That is the nature of accidents. The only thing we can do is just be more aware of your surroundings, just be a bit more educated and informed. I don't believe that a person can be "too prepared".
 

HouseHacker97

Well-Known Member
The water is more or less about 1 ft here. I don't think parent should let their child in this water. Period. Let alone while the dad is sitting at a distance. Especially because the angle the father was sitting in does not permit a clear view into the water because the sky reflects off of it, even if the water was clear enough looking straight down into it
image.jpeg
 

GoofGoof

Premium Member
I agree with that the parents shouldn't have let him, but there are ZERO signs that warn of wildlife, just not to swim. It never says do not go into the water, it never warns of wildlife, so by a kid going in not deep water compared to an adult, where it wouldn't be deep for an adult has nothing to do with gators.
This was a tragic accident. Nobody is really to blame. In Disney's defense there are signs saying no swimming. They don't list out all the reasons why and really shouldn't have to. There are brain eating amoebas, gators, snakes, bugs that sting or spread disease and any number of other dangerous things in the water. I'm sure after this tragic event there will be new signs added that warn of all of these things individually and more. That's the way the legal system works.
 

JohnD

Well-Known Member
There are videos and photos on TMZ from guests earlier this week that show gators in the water at the Grand Floridian.

Once again, the issue isn't that there are gators in the water, it's that Disney had insufficient signage warning guests of the danger and that they were throwing a movie party on a beach near a body of water where gators have been sighted.

Either way, this thing will never see a courtroom.

Definitely no blame to the parents here but you have a point about the nighttime movie beach party with known sightings of gators earlier. If I were a parent that would give me pause. Either Disney will cancel activities on the beach (more likely in the short term) or put up orange mesh at night to indicate forbidden areas.
 

GenerationX

Well-Known Member
I am curious as to how extensive Disney's standard gator relocation process is. Regardless, the lack of specificity on the signage is what the lawsuit will ultimately boil down to. Many other properties throughout Florida warn people explicitly about gators.

This has to be the most horrific, tragic week in Orlando's history.
 

Nemo14

Well-Known Member
The water is more or less about 1 ft here. I don't think parent should let their child in this water. Period. Let alone while the dad is sitting at a distance. Especially because the angle the father was sitting in does not permit a clear view into the water because the sky reflects off of it, even if the water was clear enough looking straight down into itView attachment 146133
Again, the father was right there with the child, and the child was not in a foot of water - he was in a couple of inches.
 

durangojim

Well-Known Member
If the kid drank the water and two weeks later died of infection would people be saying that there should have been signs saying "Warning! Amoebas present! Don't drink the water!"? Seems to me that would be pretty similar but I bet there wouldn't be nearly as much uproar because it's not as exciting. Disney would be no more at fault for that than they are for this.
 

Electricsoup

Well-Known Member
The water is more or less about 1 ft here. I don't think parent should let their child in this water. Period. Let alone while the dad is sitting at a distance. Especially because the angle the father was sitting in does not permit a clear view into the water because the sky reflects off of it, even if the water was clear enough looking straight down into itView attachment 146133
This is 100% nothing like the spot this happened.

The beach was zero entry. Zero. Entry. It seems like you're forming opinions based on your own experiences instead of the facts of the story.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom