Please, explain exactly how you came to this conclusion?
This is exactly my point, @
luv. Broad, over-sweeping generalizations like this. It shows a bias that renders words like "drunk" and "obnoxious" useless in anecdotal evidence. If you expect to see obnoxious young locals, every tipsy person you see under 50 becomes an obnoxious young local. If you expect to see people having a good time, the guy staggering into the bushes looks like a party animal. Just like saying HHN is "for the drunks." There generally are going to be teetotalers, and belligerent alcoholics, but on a bell curve, with the hump in the middle being reasonable people who just like to have a few drinks.
I'll reiterate again--not sure if it was in this thread--the insane crowds exacerbate everything. You just encounter more people, in closer quarters than virtually any other public situation. Bound to meet more than the average daily number of orifices, that's the law of really big numbers.