trainplane3
Well-Known Member
This relates to the pavilion but doesn't mean anything. Probably because of the MnG's...
I never said it was a good idea.The horrific armchair Imagineering idea of pairing Figment with another IP will not happen. That’s just not even an option. Again, if they use Inside Out, it will be Bing Bong not Figment.
That being said, I firmly believe Figment is here to stay.
Horizons was also IP. Everything a company makes for itself is Intellectual Property.The whole, "Figment could be paired with a popular IP... " thought process is so hilarious to me.
Figment is IP.
Whether or not Chapek realizes that or not is the issue.
I know. But too many people think it just means popular characters from pre-existing movies (which is probably what it means to Chapek and Iger).Horizons was also IP. Everything a company makes for itself is Intellectual Property.
Plus new characters for the attraction (mainly Spark the cat from the later Figment comics).I thoroughly enjoyed the Comic...why not just theme it to that. I'm sure it's already been brought up a zillion times but it is exciting, keeps with the original feel, and is very deep in environment.
I'm not sure there's any real clamoring for the original ride. I vaguely remember riding on the old version and have seen POV videos. Seems that the ride teeters between nostalgia and boredom.
I would looooove a mystic manor type ride at WDW (and no, I don't count Haunted Mansion as that, despite the history between the two ideas). Seems like a wonderful way to give
My podcast cohost had the idea of an inside out concept where you’re inside the mind of figment a la Inside Out. That would potentially allow for Figment portrayed as himself and his emotions.The horrific armchair Imagineering idea of pairing Figment with another IP will not happen. That’s just not even an option. Again, if they use Inside Out, it will be Bing Bong not Figment.
That being said, I firmly believe Figment is here to stay.
My podcast cohost had the idea of an inside out concept where you’re inside the mind of figment a la Inside Out. That would potentially allow for Figment portrayed as himself and his emotions.
With all the trackless rides WDW is getting now, I would prefer to see a different ride system. RotR has so much downtime and I’m concerned about how well Ratatouille and MMRR are going to behave once they open as well. Something reliable and high-capacity (but no less imaginative, of course.)
I can’t see mixing Figment with another franchise in an attraction working well. The characters would be fighting for guests’ attention and would most likely become a narrative mess as a result.
Inside Out isn’t about the creation coming from the human mind - it’s about emotions. Hence why it’s story was inspired by an attraction from the Wonders of Life Pavilion. They’re just not the same concepts, and from a basic story standpoint would be just as problematic as V.2 & V.3 in that they try to scientifically quantify human creativity through the senses.
Imagination needs to stay original, uninterrupted by a film franchise or a disregard for the concept of what imagination is.
With all the trackless rides WDW is getting now, I would prefer to see a different ride system. RotR has so much downtime and I’m concerned about how well Ratatouille and MMRR are going to behave once they open as well. Something reliable and high-capacity (but no less imaginative, of course.)
I'm pretty sure it's the elevators that are causing the issues (or just someone dropping a loose object on the floor).With all the trackless rides WDW is getting now, I would prefer to see a different ride system. RotR has so much downtime and I’m concerned about how well Ratatouille and MMRR are going to behave once they open as well. Something reliable and high-capacity (but no less imaginative, of course.)
I can’t see mixing Figment with another franchise in an attraction working well. The characters would be fighting for guests’ attention and would most likely become a narrative mess as a result.
Inside Out isn’t about the creation coming from the human mind - it’s about emotions. Hence why it’s story was inspired by an attraction from the Wonders of Life Pavilion. They’re just not the same concepts, and from a basic story standpoint would be just as problematic as V.2 & V.3 in that they try to scientifically quantify human creativity through the senses.
Imagination needs to stay original, uninterrupted by a film franchise or a disregard for the concept of what imagination is.
With all the trackless rides WDW is getting now, I would prefer to see a different ride system. RotR has so much downtime and I’m concerned about how well Ratatouille and MMRR are going to behave once they open as well. Something reliable and high-capacity (but no less imaginative, of course.)
autistic?I'm sorry but that sounds highly autistic.
I don't disagree, but it was an interesting an option.Hm. I think I’ll take no Figment at all if that were the case, with respect to your cohost. Haha
Best would be a Figment movie in the Pixar theatre and a brand new inside out ride.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.