I'll play your game...
Which is more enjoyable?
- Standing in a line in an enclosed space with hundreds of people for 2hrs
or
- Being free to move about and do almost nothing if you cared to?
The bar is pretty low when you are talking about 'what is better than standing in a line'
I don't know what "game" you think I'm playing.
As I've said before (several times in this thread now, in fact), the only real solution to this problem is to add attraction capacity. (way more than they're now finally starting to do)
They can juggle numbers all they want but I'm "free to move about and do almost nothing" at home and I don't have to play $120 a day to do it, I have a place to sit down (even in AC if I want), and I'm not surrounded by crowds of other people moving about doing almost nothing, too.
Do you go with young kids? If so, I'm curious how you keep them busy while "moving about doing almost nothing" at Disney? How much does it cost you in gift shops? How much complaining do you hear while walking around seemingly aimlessly while in what to them is the most exciting place on earth to do stuff while for some reason, not doing stuff?
Not advocating for lines but at least in a line for Peter Pan, they understand what they're standing around waiting for -
but believe me, I'm not advocating for that line, either!
You're right, the bar is pretty low for what is better than standing in a line. My question is, why do you seem so okay with the prospect of them barely stumbling over it?
It used to be that you could go and say you were enjoying the atmosphere. Now it's either too crowded to say that (MK for instance with all those other people already not standing in line as it is) or they've destroyed the ambiance (EPCOT with temporary walls and permanent lagoon additions).
I'm not for longer lines. I'm not for virtual ques. I'm for the supposedly greatest theme park operator in the world acting like they are and justifying the cost of a vacation there.
I know, crazy ideas, right?