News 'Encanto' and 'Indiana Jones'-themed experiences at Animal Kingdom

brb1006

Well-Known Member
giphy.gif
Forget Pizza Planet, Disney needs to make a real life replica of Mudka's Meat Hut. I hadn't seen Disney make bugs and other animals this tasty looking since The Lion King and The Lion King II
1e79e1cd-088a-49d6-9a51-e04709cda923_screenshot.jpg

hqdefault.jpg

maxresdefault.jpg
 

MistaDee

Well-Known Member
We are getting an Encanto show, Encanto ride (and maybe miniland), meet and greet, and Encanto in a character meal so far, represented in 3 parks and a resort. Now, been a while since I've been down, but I believe Frozen has a meet and greet, a show, and a ride (I don't think a character meal?) in 2 parks. Moana has a walkthrough garden and maybe a meet and greet in 2 parks? My point is that I find it odd that Encanto seems to be getting more representation than the much larger films.

Weird how many people seem to not recognize how popular Encanto is, or just have something against it.

Frozen is getting lands in Disneyland Paris, Hong Kong Disneyland and Tokyo DisneySea in addition to the ride at Epcot. That seems like a lot of Frozen to me
 

DisneyDodo

Well-Known Member
I actually liked the idea of an Oceania land (and having Moana together with the Nemo show made sense in that regard) in DAK with some animals from Australia or the Pacific islands. I wouldn't object to adding that somewhere else in the park.
If they wanted to build an Oceania land that incorporates Nemo, they still have some room to work with even without including Dinoland (depending on the feasibility of moving some backstage buildings).

They could build a new bridge between the expansion plot next to EE and the area behind Nemo.

1712094739976.png
 

Mike S

Well-Known Member
Pankot Palace dining won’t happen. Too many people on twitter will complain about how culturally insensitive it is to depict foreign cultures eating such food.

And by “too many people on twitter,” I mean 2 people that Disney will treat like 2 Billion.
 

yensidtlaw1969

Well-Known Member
Pankot Palace dining won’t happen. Too many people on twitter will complain about how culturally insensitive it is to depict foreign cultures eating such food.

And by “too many people on twitter,” I mean 2 people that Disney will treat like 2 Billion.
The fact of the matter is that Disney doesn't listen to anyone except themselves. For better or for worse.
 

Tha Realest

Well-Known Member
As soon as Pooh hit public domain a cheesy slasher film dropped. Then, they made a quick sequel:
Update: ANOTHER SEQUEL IS ON THE WAY

 

Incomudro

Well-Known Member
What about it did you find so unsavory?

It's by no means a favorite film but I thought it was significantly better than Frozen, Wish, Raya, Strange World - pretty much anything besides Moana in the last 15 years or so
It just didn't work for me.
I had it on, and got perhaps half way through then I shut it off due to some things going on in the house - and I just didn't
have the desire to get back to it.
I did like Frozen (didn't love it) haven't seen Wish or Strange World.
I did watch Princess and the Frog due to the retheme of Splash, and really liked it.
Really enjoyed Moana as well.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Not in this instance, we are referring to multiple sets of data Disney is using to compare movie performance. Thus data is plural

I'm really not usually a grammar Nazi I don't know what has come over me
And what if I want to use 'data' as a collective noun, like "the team is here," or "mathematics is my favorite subject"?
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
Yea I always find it funny when people think Walt wouldn’t be pushing as much IP into the parks as Iger is today if he was alive. Walt was the king of cross promoting his IP across film, TV, merchandise and parks. He pretty much invented it. I can’t imagine what he would have done if he had the amount of IP to play with that the company has now.

That's how you know Disney as a company now is lacking. They are not doing as much as they should have.

Even with Walt having so many IPs in the parks represented, they were where they specifically fit far better than what is done now and more frequently.

Don't be so sure that it would be so much the same.

Treasure Island was one of Walt Disney Pictures biggest hits of the era, and we still had Pirates of the Caribbean with motifs of many classic pirate stories and lore. Not Treasure Island. Disneyland was the American Mythology and the lense through it.

20K came out in 1954.

Walt Disney still opened Submarine Voyage for Disneyland in 1959, not 20K, which would come much later in other parks.

Walt Disney opened Matterhorn. Not third man on the mountain: The ride.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom