• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

DAK 'Encanto' and 'Indiana Jones'-themed experiences at Animal Kingdom

JackCH

Well-Known Member
Hey guys! Let’s all take five calm and deeeep breaths and move on from this conversation. Let’s bring the topic back to:

'Encanto' and 'Indiana Jones'-themed experiences at Animal Kingdom​

WDI has made excellent attractions and terrible disasters in both decades, and the parks have all received improvement from these decades. There really isn’t much to fight about…
The real question is will Encanto be better than Primeval Whirl? ;)
 

peter11435

Well-Known Member
No I am not. Never was. Pointing out their lack of frequency.
That is why there are eras with more greats than others.
lol. You absolutely are! Do you even hear yourself?

You’ve specifically brought up some of the greatest attractions of the past TOT, Splash, and Imagination and selectively compared them to the weakest modern projects Tiana, Toy Story Land, and Tron.
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
lol. You absolutely are! Do you even hear yourself?

You’ve specifically brought up some of the greatest attractions of the past TOT, Splash, and Imagination and selectively compared them to the weakest modern projects Tiana, Toy Story Land, and Tron.
No. Go back. It was asked what was the era of show stoppers was if someone were to say.(for the record I never said Imagination but that was a great k e six months after in 1983. So I don't even think you read my posts)
I said 1988 to 1998 was full of the most common sistent large investments of greats with most still present, followed by 1972 to about 1982 being the second if one had to pick.

Those greats were not cherry picked. They all fit in a decade.

And as you know have agreed. That era is objectively WDI stronger with hits. Let it go.

The frequency of greats are further apart. Objectively.

As noted. If the new attractions for AK are great, they land ten years since the last great for that park.
 
Last edited:

peter11435

Well-Known Member
No. Go back. It was asked what was the era of show stoppers was if someone were to say.(for the record I never said Imagination but that was a great k e six months after in 1983. So I don't even think you read my posts)
I said 1988 to 1998 was full of the most common sistent large investments of greats with most still present, followed by 1972 to about 1982 being the second if one had to pick.

Those greats were not cherry picked. They all fit in a decade.

And as you know have agreed. That era is objectively WDI stronger with hits. Let it go.

The frequency of greats are further apart. Objectively.

As noted. If the new attractions for AK are great, they land ten years since the last great for that park.
It was another poster that mentioned Imagination and you reacted. My mistake on that one.

And again, you’re missing my point. I’m not saying you’re cherry picking great attractions. I’m saying you’re cherry picking weaker modern attractions to solidify your point.
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
It was another poster that mentioned Imagination and you reacted. My mistake on that one.

And again, you’re missing my point. I’m not saying you’re cherry picking great attractions. I’m saying you’re cherry picking weaker modern attractions to solidify your point.
Same acusation just flipped argument What era are those in?


I said the gaps between the greats are longer. Objectively true, even with your confusion.
There have been some fun hits scattered...
The era that replaced the greats with lesser...hmm. makes it more obvious which one had more showstoppers for WDI's legacy doesn't it?

Tower of Terror and Splash Mountain and Muppet Vision Era with the weaker major attractions being RnR, Cointdown to Extinction and Alien Encounter, and Honey I Shrunk The Audience ...

Or Guardians, Rat and Pandora. With weaker being Tiana, Tron Slinky and Alien saucers.
One of these has much less. And I did not even mention all of fellow medium hitters of the first era.

Is it really that close for you?
Subjectively. Great if true. You are in the GSAT minority. But still good for you.

Objectively there were more frequent and better rated attractions in the former mentioned.


My original comment was WDI still does great things, but you wait longer. Specifically I meant about a decade between big tickets in each park in what used to be never more than 5.
 
Last edited:

peter11435

Well-Known Member
Same acusation just flipped argument What era are those in?


I said the gaps between the greats are longer. Objectively true, even with your confusion.
There habe been some fun hits scattered...
The era that replaced the greats with lesser...hmm. makes it more obvious which one had more showstoppers for WDI's legacy doesn't it?

Tower of Terror and Splash Mountain and Muppet Vision Era with the weaker major attractions being RnR, Cointdown to Extinction and Alien Encounter, and Honey I Shrunk The Audience ...

Or Guardians, Rat and Pandora. With weaker being Tiana, Tron Slinky and Alien saucers.
One of these has much less. And I did not even mention all of fellow medium hitters of the first era.

Isnitnreally that close for you?
Subjectively. Great if true. You are in the Gsat minority. But still good for you.

Objectively there were more frequent and better rated attractions in the former mentioned.


My original comment was WDI still does great things, but you wait longer. Specifically I meant about a decade between big tickets in each park in what used to be never more than 5.
I don’t know if it’s your reading comprehension or if you just intentionally want to miss the point. But clearly you’re just not getting it.

Have a good night lol
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
I don’t know if it’s your reading comprehension or if you just intentionally want to miss the point. But clearly you’re just not getting it.

Have a good night lol
I get you are making a point, it just has little to do with what everyone else is discussing.

But go on and insult and run. @JackCH @Casper Gutman For what it is worth, I thought it was a cool ponder to bring up. Thanks for the discussion
 

peter11435

Well-Known Member
I get you are making a point, it just has little to do with what everyone else is discussing.

But go on and insult and run. @JackCH @Casper Gutman For what it is worth, I thought it was a cool ponder to bring up. Thanks for the discussion
I’m not running. I’m just tired of having this discussion with someone who is intentionally missing the point. I’m not even sure you knew what you were discussing half the time as you continually added additional qualifiers and filters. I’m not the only one who has called you out for that here.
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
I’m not running. I’m just tired of having this discussion with someone who is intentionally missing the point. I’m not even sure you knew what you were discussing half the time as you continually added additional qualifiers and filters. I’m not the only one who has called you out for that here.
No point was intentionally missed. There was just little to do with the discussion. We hear ya. Well everyone else was done with the discussion and you come out blazing as if there is some point that must be missed. Then the lols, the insults and goodnight comes in. Yeah, best to stop if you are tired.

I like the ponders and discussions the others post.
 
Last edited:

UNCgolf

Well-Known Member
This was true of Magic Kingdom as well, which had stores like The King's Gallery, House of Magic, Old World Antiques, plus smaller diversions like Main Street Cinema (when it was a Cinema).

The homogenizing of WDW didn't just dilute individual park themes, it made many stores and restaurants bland too.

Definitely -- it just didn't hurt Magic Kingdom as much as it hurt DHS because Magic Kingdom had (and still has) so much else going for it.

It's one of the biggest reason the Magic Kingdom feels like a slightly weaker park today than it did in 1993, though. There have been other changes, but they're more or less a wash overall with some improvements and some decline.
 
Last edited:

Centauri Space Station

Well-Known Member
The problem is that none of the new attractions are clear “home runs” - they all have significant downsides. I love MMRR, for instance… but it replaced another attraction I ALSO loved, so it’s a lateral move. The closest thing to a pure “win” is Avatar Land, but that land still feels underbuilt and the water ride is one third of an attraction.

Nothing Disney has built recently in Orlando compares to ToT, the original Imagination, Splash Mountain…
Rise, Fop, Guardians?
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom