KDM31091
Well-Known Member
I can almost guarantee it. It’s their favorite wordUltimate question- Will Disney use the name "Adventure" in either the Indy or Encanto attraction?
I can almost guarantee it. It’s their favorite wordUltimate question- Will Disney use the name "Adventure" in either the Indy or Encanto attraction?
In its heyday, wow what an attraction it was. I'm in the camp you're in as well, shutter it before it becomes even more embarrassing.I think Dinosaur was great attraction for a very long time, but the version that exists today has embarassingly poor show quality. The increased lighting, neon paint on the dinosaurs, reduced thrills, the asteroid being replaced with a static Carnotaurus head, and on and on. It's honestly depressing to me how bad the ride has gotten and I'd rather see it close than keep operating in its current state.
Disney has known for a long time they were replacing this attraction, so they stopped putting money into upkeep. The same was true with Splash Mountain before it became Tiana.In its heyday, wow what an attraction it was. I'm in the camp you're in as well, shutter it before it becomes even more embarrassing.
Indiana Jones Adventure: Temple of the Mayan Gods???Ultimate question- Will Disney use the name "Adventure" in either the Indy or Encanto attraction?
Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't the asteroid replaced very early on in the attraction's life? It's definitely not a recent change. I do agree the animatronics aren't well maintained and break often, though at least so far they have been repairing them it seems. The sauropod was broken for awhile but has been fixed. One of the carnotaurous was broken too but only briefly. The pterodactyl hasn't moved in many years so I don't really call it broken; it's intentionally shut off.I think Dinosaur was great attraction for a very long time, but the version that exists today has embarassingly poor show quality. The increased lighting, neon paint on the dinosaurs, reduced thrills, the asteroid being replaced with a static Carnotaurus head, and on and on. It's honestly depressing to me how bad the ride has gotten and I'd rather see it close than keep operating in its current state.
...but Indiana Jones does?Dinoland doesn't really fit in with the rest of the park
An attraction that includes Indiana Jones could, depending on the content. As with everything, it doesn’t mean he as a character or IP automatically does....but Indiana Jones does?
It seemed from last year’s D23 that it stemmed from Bruce coming back on board.Did Joe consult on this land at all? While I don’t like the replace vs. expand mentality - what i do like is this land is not an IP land. It is a land that fits the over-all theme of the park and also will be home to multiple IP’s.
That was my thought as well. You could keep with the land naming schema by calling it Pangaea or Gondwana and populating it with flora descended from that geological era.My main hope is that in the distant future they do revisits the dinosaur concept, but maybe take us back to the prehistoric age in terms of theming rather than just utilize real world objects like a museum and a county fair.
There's stuff being staged behind the Dinosaur show building. Not sure if it's directly tied to the Tropical Americasreplacementexpansion, but interesting stuff regardless.
Looks to be some A/C units, construction lifts, and dumpsters?
August 18, 2024:
View attachment 810667
April 2024:
View attachment 810668
Source and pics:
Or a shift in philosophy at the top, which is possible. Just not under Iger.I really like Dinosaur, but the Indy and overall retheme makes a lot of sense. Dinoland doesn't really fit in with the rest of the park (which is my favorite designed of all WDW parks).
I would love in the future to have a big budget dinosaur land back in AK, but that likely requires a successful Disney-owned IP tie-in to make happen.
They haven't started work on the new trailer complex yet.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.