I knew that that character was envisioned to be non-binary and I was attentive to how that was clued in in the movie and it went by so fast that I quite literally missed it. I was all "wait... was that it?"I saw the movie and had no idea the character was non-binary. While I support the inclusion, it was so minor that it wasn't even worth noting. The character (if you can even call them a character, the role is so small) doesn't even identify as non-binary in the film! The actor bragging they are playing the first "non-binary" character on social media won't drive LGBT people to see the movie, as the representation is so minor that it's extremely easy to miss. In fact, all I think it will do is just fuel anti-LGBT boycotts of the film and give Disney haters another reason to celebrate the film's failure at the box office for going "woke."
I think the people working on these movies should just let the LGBT rep speak for itself instead of congratulating themselves and getting headlines over blink-and-you-miss-it moments.
Never mind that most of the elemental people, and especially the water ones, weren't stereotypically engendered to begin with (with a few exceptions). The elemental nature of their existence sorta blurred out their secondary sexual features.