Catching up:
In the park the "designer curse" hits me, (similar to AP-itus) where all you can do mentally is critique everything or only see things for what they should be, could be, or once were. Awful. You eye is drawn to visual intrusions, not what you are supposed to look at.
I have this condition really bad, even though I'm not a designer or anything near it. And it's even more frustrating since I'm the world's worst artist and will thus have no chance of righting the wrongs I see. I've wondered in the past at times whether I should keep going back, as I *do* wind up not looking at what I'm supposed to look at. I'm craning my neck, looking around, and wondering what could be done if you knocked out that wall over there and themed this area to so and so... Anyway, I find myself not enjoying the park I've paid to enjoy but instead I'm busy giving it a massive overhaul in my mind. And I could do that at home for all the good it'll do me!
It is kinda funny you mention that. I am a highschool student and I took some old Oswald and Mickey DVD's in to class when we were studying the 1920's and we watched some of the cartoons, oddly enough I had never heard a group of highschool students laugh so much as when we were watching those cartoons.
I love when stuff like that happens. Once I was on a camping trip with the Scouts, and everyone was reading comics. The guys all had their copies of Wolverine or Batman (this was the late 80s), and I had my Carl Barks Uncle Scrooges. I thought they'd give me no end of grief, but they wound up reading them too.
The old stuff was entertaining then, and it's entertaining now. Those early shorts, the good live-action comedies, etc. The problem is that Disney was taken over by people who looked down on their own product. Thus everything had to be presented ironically, like the WDW Tiki Room remake. They couldn't present something with sincerity, since they themselves sneered at their product. We need people with a connection to the material running the company so they're not afraid to present their own product without fear of being seen as unhip.
Last night at dinner we discussed who our all time favorite actors were. Our 10 yr old daughter said Streisand, Doris Day, Don Adams, Hayley Mills, Marilyn Monroe, Tony Curtis, Abbot and Costello, Lucy, and Miley Cyrus! Our 10 yr old son said Hayley Mills, Chaplin, George Lopez, Laurel and Hardy, Paulette Goddard, Paul Lynde, AnnaSophia Robb, the kid in Gremlins, etc. They mashed up the dead and alive stars. They see all of them as equally good and didn't prejudge them generationally.
That's brilliant. I think you might win parent of the year, and your kids definitely win the awesome award. Paulette Goddard and Paul Lynde?! It's like they looked into my unconscious mind. This alone has renewed my faith in a generation.
I've wondered if I have kids what I could do to keep them from being completely absorbed by the pitfalls of the modern world. And to namedrop Don Adams and Marilyn Monroe. But I guess all you really have to do is take the time to expose them to good things, which most people don't do. If you let the TV be the babysitter indiscriminately there's trouble; better to use it surgically to maximize potential awesomeness.
In any case, there's something in the Disney mindset that's both decidedly retro and yet future looking. I grew up in the 80s and was totally into "old" stuff, but a total tech geek at the same time. It's a bizarre paradox, when you think about it, but you can see it easily in this thread: the wrought-iron details of Hello Dolly and the neon futurescape of the World of Motion.
Encounter Restaurant at LAX had lava lamps that dad would relate to but they were themed in a modern way that would look like something Philippe Starck would have done. Same with the music. There was 1960's "jet set" lounge music woven into new cover versions of those classics by DJ's so it was reinvented to a degree for both audiences. That seemed to work very well. I think if there was a way to address the "experience gap", this may be a small gesture toward that.
Sometimes cool is just cool, whether you have a nostalgic awareness or not!
So.....Imagine WOM returning in a different form (ala Spiderman?), same story and redoing TT so it ends with us boarding the future in the new "Tron legacy" lightcycles!
I always thought they should have left WOM pretty much as is, except grafted the Test Track outside loop on as the finale... I envision "boxing in" that large loop into the parking lot in a show building and having a massive black-light cityscape-in-motion reminiscent of the original WOM ending...
This has often made me wonder what exactly is different now about Tom Sawyer Island. The novel Tom Sawyer was no more contemporary int the fifties than it is today. Mark Twain lived and died long before Anyone from that generation was around and yet TSI was much more popular then. So is it just that TSI needs to be updated to appeal to current tastes in entrrtainment or is there something deeper going on?
I've wondered this too. This kind of got under my skin when they were doing the overlay, and talked about how kids just don't know who Tom Sawyer is now. That just doesn't make sense to me - Tom Sawyer was an "old" book in 1955 and it's an "old" book now. I'm not aware that he's disappeared from the public consciousness or anything. Sure, Pirates is "hot" right now, but was Sawyer really a huge property in 1955? I don't think it's fair to compare...
That is true. This was during the Pressler era of closing rides and saving cost. The proposal was to lose the rafts and do a subterreanean catacomb that begins in a crypt in the Hm graveyard and leads to a underground capsized vessel beneath "Lafitte's Island" across the ROA. In history, there was a real island directly across from New Orleans called Barrataria where Lafitte's Pirates traded with the cityfolk. This was an homage to that with lots of cool effects, etc. The TSI pirate idea we see today came later and is based on the POTC films.
While I'm a fan of TSI classic, I have to say that this is a pretty rockin' idea. I'd hate to see the rafts gone, but this was a genius compromise. Very atmospheric.
Bonus trivia...Tony Baxter was an extra on that set during the parade scene so he is a fan too!
That's insane. Mind is blown.
I have never seen the studios. But the one thing that concerns me about Europe is this horrible ban on incandescent light bulbs. Making everyone use the compact florescent bulb (twisty one) will make for the ugliest Main Street and DLP ever. The cold color and flat intensity of those lights is hideous. It really depresses me.
http://www.businesspundit.com/new-light-bulb-rules-make-citizens-hoard-old-bulbs/
Eek. John Hench would go ballistic. Maybe they could get some sort of compromise for themed areas? Maybe purchase carbon offsets or some such? Florescents on Main Street would be terrible...
It's funny how unbuilt projects live forever in the concept art. What gets built never is as good as the project that wasn't. Long live Sci-Fi City!
Indeed.
"Disney's America" as a name triggers up all kinds of "red flags" in today's world. It creates the expectation that somehow "America" as Disney sees it will be spun to you in a way that is overtly sanitizes history. Main Street does that. It is not the 19th century, it's how you wished it was. So make that "Disney's America" and many think your out there to editorialize or trivialize history.
I still hate that the America project died. Obviously there were a lot of motives for the different opposition groups, and an attitude of general snobbery from the "gatekeepers" who seem to want to have history all to themselves. But if it had been done *right*, it could have exposed more visitors to those historical events and themes than a dozen other historical attractions combined. It could have also used the drawing power of the Disney name to spark an interest in the minds of visitors, which would have led them to explore other sites and historic parks that they might have overlooked before. What EPCOT should be to science and ideas, America could have been to our own history.
And if they'd done it tastefully, it could acknowledge the shortcomings of our past while not dwelling on the negative and instead showing how we can learn for the future.
All I remember was the 2nd Gate Studio Tour project that Bob Weis was heading up. We worked on other ideas for maybe a third gate but it was pretty loose.
Ah, thanks for the answer. There just seem to be these random instances between 1991-1996 (and perhaps beyond, although I haven't seen any yet) of Disney officials talking about the third gate being EPCOT-derived. This even happens after all the financial difficulties, and the delay of the second gate. I've only ever seen one rendering, but it doesn't show anything besides the geosphere looming behind the Newport hotel.