Eddie Sotto
Premium Member
Im loving the hot wheels edition Camaro.
If your designed car looks exactly like a Chevy Malibu, then you get a perfect score. It is the pinnacle of automotive design.
Good commentary. All good points.I'm not sure why guests repeated TT, but I'd guess it was for the thrill primarily. It will be interesting to hear why and if they repeat this version. I will see Trevor after the holiday and ask him for his insights.
No one mentions the pre/post show "design your car" continuum or the interactives that make it more of a pavilion. I think in addition to the ride we should evaluate the total experience. To me, the cones "wore off" while I was riding 1.0, at least 2.0 seems like another world that I would enjoy being in. I need to ride it to have a true feel. I understand the notion that 2.0 may be more look and less substance, but when you are overdressing the same track, where do you go with it except to make it all more interesting? I think it comes off as more seamless in the video and the pre and post shows blend into the ride as the story crosses over nicely. I like being in a "design studio" world more than a "test facility", but that's just me. The world they created is something I'd pay admission for versus a warehouse, etc.
I hope Kevin responds to the discussion as he reads this thread.
On today's Miceage, Kevin Yee has literally raved about Test Track 2.0 and now I'm wondering if a trip to WDW is in order. Kevin claims it is better than New Fantasyland. Have any of you been on it, and if so, what are your thoughts? So so or so cool?
Actually, I think that's the one gaffe from TT 2.0 that bothers me. From the videos I've seen, your scores (capability, efficiency, responsiveness, power?) show up immediately with your car in the design studio. You can see the scores fluctuate as you tweak your car design... umm, isn't that why we're taking our SimCar out on the SimTrack? To get the scores to these tests to let us know how our design really functions? IMO, they should give you hints in the design studio like, "Doing x will help your power but hurt your efficiency", but not show you your scores until you get on the ride and do the tests. Just a little detail that doesn't really fit the continuity. I'm still dying to ride.
Another WDWMagic member reminded us all that you are here and how wonderful just having a non-biased but highly knowledgable person participating in conversation has been.
If it survived the massive cutsI can't wait to see how many of these TT effects make it to Shanghai for the Tron ride.
At the same time, one of the things that's kept Star Wars relevant for 35+ years is that they have been willing to use the intellectual propoerty on things that someone like Rowling wouldn't.Agree. There is a fine line. I think they should make SW scarce fir a while and then create a demand for the franchise when the new films come out. Im getting burned out on the ironic use of the characters. Someday they will have no meaning.
At the same time, one of the things that's kept Star Wars relevant for 35+ years is that they have been willing to use the intellectual propoerty on things that someone like Rowling wouldn't.
Do you think Rowling would have let Disney make a Mickey Mouse/Harry Potter Big Fig? Would Robot Chicken or Family Guy be allowed to spoof Harry Potter?
At the same time, one of the things that's kept Star Wars relevant for 35+ years is that they have been willing to use the intellectual propoerty on things that someone like Rowling wouldn't.
Do you think Rowling would have let Disney make a Mickey Mouse/Harry Potter Big Fig? Would Robot Chicken or Family Guy be allowed to spoof Harry Potter?
That is true, but isn't it also true that like telling a joke too many times, you can burn out on seeing Darth Vader in too many ironic situations? I say bring back the old crew in some way and just make some really good movies.
No Rowling has higher standards than that.Do you think Rowling would have let Disney make a Mickey Mouse/Harry Potter Big Fig? Would Robot Chicken or Family Guy be allowed to spoof Harry Potter?
That's what i was getting at. But at the same time, it very well could be the thing that results in Harry Potter not maintaining popularity. Star Wars, good or bad has been in the public eye long after the movies. If Rowling can continue to have her IP used in ways that she approves she can be successful, but a certain level of "selling out" has kept Star Wars relevant for 35+ years.No Rowling has higher standards than that.
I have a dream.
It may not sound like much on the surface, but when fully imagined, it probably could only be a dream. Here goes.
I would love to see an evening where all of the merchandise is removed from the Magic Kingdom and all of the architectural distractions are removed as well. Like scraping away all of the crust from the top of a ketchup bottle. All of those "layers" that were never intended, but were added over time by necessity, like credit card advertisements at the cash register, or booths that sell timeshares, incongruous track lighting and slatwall, speaker and lighting poles, and the plethora of operational signage, trash cans, turnstiles, and other contradictory minutia. (Fat chance you say? That's why it's called a dream. But it's mine and I'm not done yet.) Once the land is free of thematic contradiction and the only thing left are the "sets on the stage", I would invite motion picture set decorators to come with truckloads of props and dressings, even the appropriate merchandise, and redecorate all of the spaces inside and out to be properly themed to a level of depth and realism that truly transports us to those worlds of yesterday, tomorrow, and fantasy. We would then rent theatrical costumes for the cast members that are varied and different and reflect their personality. As a finishing touch, actors provide "Streetmosphere" throughout each themed realm. No character parade.
Of course in this dream, I've hidden an access code in this post (DREAMALIVE) and so you are all invited to the richest thematic evening ever. Okay I'm done.
So the reason this is a dream is because I have always wondered what the true unbridled thematic potential really is underneath all of the commercial and operational requirements of a Disney Park. I want it all to be real like a movie, if just for one night. Then they can go back to selling Churros. I think that's one reason why it's so fun to walk around in the evening or in the morning before or after opening. Having the park to yourself allows you to be at one with the theme of each land. Perhaps even to silently role-play in the back of your mind.
Trying to make Main Street as much like a movie set as possible was one of our goals on Disneyland Paris. In a way, when I visit the park and walk through those façades I secretly wish that they would pay off like the sets of the movie, but I know that's not possible, and yes, I would like fries with that.
Eddie - how does your dream compare to reenactments?
Say... Colonial Williamsburg? Or culture/folk museums? I've been to ones where it's completely pure except the visitors themselves.
They don't seem to be packing in the millions like Disney. Maybe the subject matter is holding them back... But is retail really hurting it? I think back to quarks bar in the Star Trek experience. That was integrated well and worked.
So it leads me to the question... Which is the distraction? The retail itself, or the implementation?
And would a 'true citizen' experience of say.. Main Street be enough of a draw? Look at the nature trails at dak. Those could be seen as a 'pure' experience attempt... And many guests bypass it all together
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.