So a British gentFairly sure Ian Fleming simply described him as Scottish.
So a British gentFairly sure Ian Fleming simply described him as Scottish.
As a Scot I was correcting your statement that he was English. You also added in your own description which was never written by Fleming.
Ok.....just change my original description to Scot. My point was whatever the character was written or made to be really doesn't have to be changed.As a Scot I was correcting your statement that he was English. You also added in your own description which was never written by Fleming.
Fleming apparently made Bond half-Scottish, half-Swiss. He didn't mention his Scottish heritage until after Connery had already started playing the role:Fairly sure Ian Fleming simply described him as Scottish.
The story is so far removed from Hans Christian Andersen's original tale that there is no reason to assume its setting or characters are Danish. As I said, the film's own visuals clearly locate the story in a much warmer climate, with palm trees on land and colourful coral reefs underwater. It is, above all, a fantasy in which nationality and race really don't matter.Well, since Disney never said otherwise, the original story is by Hans Christian Andersen who was Danish, so we can assume they were still keeping with the Danish origin.
The actors who've played Bond so far look pretty different from one another. The only thing they have in common is that they're white.And yes, Connery was a Scot but any people had no idea about that, because he was still from the U.K. ..either way , he looked the same.
...oooookThe story is so far removed from Hans Christian Andersen's original tale that there is no reason to assume its setting or characters are Danish. As I said, the film's own visuals clearly locate the story in a much warmer climate, with palm trees on land and colourful coral reefs underwater. It is, above all, a fantasy in which nationality and race really don't matter.
The actors who've played Bond so far look pretty different from one another. They only thing they have in common is that they're white.
The story is so far removed from Hans Christian Andersen's original tale that there is no reason to assume its setting or characters are Danish. As I said, the film's own visuals clearly locate the story in a much warmer climate, with palm trees on land and colourful coral reefs underwater. It is, above all, a fantasy in which nationality and race really don't matter.
Or wait to watch it for free on D+ with the rest of us.Guess what - the movie has been filmed, the cast was cast, it's coming out. Either go or don't.
Ok.....just change my original description to Scot. My point was whatever the character was written or made to be really doesn't have to be changed.
Or wait to watch it for free on D+ with the rest of us.
My prediction is another box office failure followed up with another thread (that will eventually be locked) about “why” it failed?
All of the Renaissance animated films have made a bunch of money so I have no doubt this one will as well. And everything going on with this one will most likely get extra butts in seats to see what all the fuss is about.I think this one will be a success
I think it’ll easily make the top 10 streaming minutes list once it’s released on D+ but will have a disappointing box office, which will inevitably end up with another thread and arguments over whether it’s the movie choices or the new D+ format that are hurting box office.I think this one will be a success
All of the Renaissance animated films have made a bunch of money so I have no doubt this one will as well. And everything going on with this one will most likely get extra butts in seats to see what all the fuss is about.
I think this one will be a success
Big box office success..critical failure.Lion King
Based on past performance for remakes of the same kind, what makes you think this will fail?
Beauty and The Beast, Aladdin, Lion King, have all had great success.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.