Jedijax719
Well-Known Member
LOL-then invest in something else.When you impact my stock price, you have a serious effect on me.
LOL-then invest in something else.When you impact my stock price, you have a serious effect on me.
Or, maybe, just maybe, everyone could do the job they're paid to do and create content that puts butts in seats, make money, and drive shareholder value. It's not like they don't know how to do that (altho I wonder sometimes). Or is this capitalist thinking wrong?LOL-then invest in something else.
As I’ve pointed out before, a number of Disney’s best-loved classics failed to make a profit upon their release. I’m not saying the remake of The Little Mermaid will rank among them, but we as Disney fans should know better than to measure a film’s merits and impact solely or mainly in terms of dollars.Or, maybe, just maybe, everyone could do the job they're paid to do and create content that puts butts in seats, make money, and drive shareholder value. It's not like they don't know how to do that (altho I wonder sometimes). Or is this capitalist thinking wrong?
Agreed, TWDCs movie business is not all about the money.As I’ve pointed out before, a number of Disney’s best-loved classics failed to make a profit upon their release. I’m not saying the remake of The Little Mermaid will rank among them, but we as Disney fans should know better than to measure a film’s merits and impact solely or mainly in terms of dollars.
Disney's live action studio breaks even over time thanks to the few billion dollar tentpoles. And then there's the post-theatrical window in which more money can be made off the studio's content. So, even Disney's least profitable studio makes a profit.Agreed, TWDCs movie business is not all about the money.
TWDC's theme park business IS ALL ABOUT THE MONEY!
How else can TWDC pay for its movie business?
Never said Disney studios are collapsing, they are just allowed to be hit and miss at random (this has always been the case).Disney's live action studio breaks even over time thanks to the few billion dollar tentpoles. And then there's the post-theatrical window in which more money can be made off the studio's content. So, even Disney's least profitable studio makes a profit.
DAS, Pixar, Star Wars, and Marvel all make bank in the theatrical window on average. And then more in the post-theatrical window.
The narrative that Disney's studios are collapsing is a false narrative based on hopeful schadenfreude, not data.
As I’ve pointed out before, a number of Disney’s best-loved classics failed to make a profit upon their release. I’m not saying the remake of The Little Mermaid will rank among them, but we as Disney fans should know better than to measure a film’s merits and impact solely or mainly in terms of dollars.
Or maybe the Aladdin remake also had a cultural impact and also happened to make money and that's why no one is talking about it?And this is why I’ve been trying to discuss cultural impact. Disney can look at the domestic returns, and would see that there is an audience and a path to monetize further in North America.
And I do believe this film will have a bigger cultural impact than say… the Aladdin remake.
Or maybe the Aladdin remake also had a cultural impact and also happened to make money and that's why no one is talking about it?
I just wish there was a little more hit and a lot less miss . . .Never said Disney studios are collapsing, they are just allowed to be hit and miss at random (this has always been the case).
The theme parks on the other hand must not only make money but must hit targets - See the Star Cruiser.
Oh give it up! If you think you know what kind of content will automatically get butts in seats, then get yourself a job with a studio and see how that works out for ya! Part of capitalism is also that not everything works the way everyone had hoped.Or, maybe, just maybe, everyone could do the job they're paid to do and create content that puts butts in seats, make money, and drive shareholder value. It's not like they don't know how to do that (altho I wonder sometimes). Or is this capitalist thinking wrong?
Any after 1959?As I’ve pointed out before, a number of Disney’s best-loved classics failed to make a profit upon their release. I’m not saying the remake of The Little Mermaid will rank among them, but we as Disney fans should know better than to measure a film’s merits and impact solely or mainly in terms of dollars.
Didn’t you hear? They shut that down about 5 years agoDisney's live action studio breaks even over time thanks to the few billion dollar tentpoles. And then there's the post-theatrical window in which more money can be made off the studio's content. So, even Disney's least profitable studio makes a profit.
DAS, Pixar, Star Wars, and Marvel all make bank in the theatrical window on average. And then more in the post-theatrical window.
Not the argument ever made. But it’s cool to invent to “counter” when they drop crap on the streetThe narrative that Disney's studios are collapsing is a false narrative based on hopeful schadenfreude, not data.
There’s no cultural impact. That creating an ambiguous thing that can’t be proven so it also can’t be proven wrong.And this is why I’ve been trying to discuss cultural impact. Disney can look at the domestic returns, and would see that there is an audience and a path to monetize further in North America.
And I do believe this film will have a bigger cultural impact than say… the Aladdin remake.
That has nothing to do with my point, which is simply that fans typically care about more than just how much something makes.Any after 1959?
The same reason they spent millions on microchiping drink cups to save pennies?Tell me again why Burbank spent Billions to build theme parks there to "get a foothold" in that marketplace of 1.4 Billion people. So they could make an extra 3 or 4 million per film?
Again, you forget that this country has had 2+ years of high inflation.
Adjusted for inflation from the anti-inflationary year of 2019, Mermaid is not tracking close to Aladdin. It's behind by at least $100 Million.
Then factor in that Aladdin did over three times the overseas box office that Mermaid has done, and it's not even close.
The domestic box office is adjusted for inflation, but the overseas box office is not (because of dozens of different exchange rates), but even the total not adjusted for inflation puts Mermaid at less than half of Aladdin globally.
Once again, this is not sustainable. Especially when you spend $250 Million just to produce the film to begin with.
View attachment 725260
Movie Comparison: The Little Mermaid (2023) vs. Aladdin (2019)
Domestic box office comparison between The Little Mermaid (2023) and Aladdin (2019)www.the-numbers.com
Not gonna get thereI understood your point just fine, you clearly don't understand or care about mine. It's a statement of factor. Aladdin lets us project the final domestic take for Little Mermaid, which will be about 325 million domestic. Not 225 like everyone declared last weekend or 255 like the poster I was responding to declared. 325 million in todays dollars.
Not gonna get thereThat's it. It's not a round of applause of little Mermaid, it's just a here's the probable final number.
Take a guess what I’m gonna say?I likewise expect the final worldwide total to also be high 500's.
Hey you finally got one right. I’m proud of you.
Cool. Say, do ya think that's why Disney just got rid of its diversity chief? Because it realized it didn't really need one in the first place?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.