mp2bill
Well-Known Member
Actually, I disagree with all of you...it makes perfect sense to me. While the grammar is incorrect, why haven't you all been complaining that it is "Walt Disney World" instead of "Walt Disney's World" then? Seems like they are just going back to the roots of their original theme park naming. It was Disneyland and Disney World, not Disney's Land or Disney's World.
I'm not saying that they're intentionally slapping him in the face, but you can be so nearsighted on an issue (changing the name for synergy) that you forget your roots. Why not change everything to "Disney's" (implying Walt Disney's) instead of "Disney" (the company) if their concern is synergy?
For the exact same reason that Pete C stated:
I think we're going back and forth here on something that we agree upon, but something's just not getting through. I guess the overriding point that most people are making is, "Why change something 20 years later (DHS) to create cohesiveness in something that most people don't even notice."
I seems like a lot of wasted money (maybe that money could go towards fixing the Yeti on EE) for something that most people don't even care about until it's brought up in one of these forums. I doubt many people look at something that says "Disney's Hollywood Studios" and say, "Hey! That's improper grammar," or "I'm not visiting because the name isn't synergistic to the rest of the Disney/Disney's property."