Disney Analyst
Well-Known Member
I think new look will be gorgeous. It was bland before.
I think new look will be gorgeous. It was bland before.
So, the wrap is most likely a reproduction of Fantasyland '83 concept art. That doesn't mean they AREN'T changing the facade to look more like that, but since it's old art there's a good chance it's not going to look like that at all.
View attachment 446420
I knew this concept art was too good to come from current WDI.So, the wrap is most likely a reproduction of Fantasyland '83 concept art. That doesn't mean they AREN'T changing the facade to look more like that, but since it's old art there's a good chance it's not going to look like that at all.
View attachment 446420
Pinocchio sure needs an overhaul...such an extraordinary film, the ride doesn't even come close to doing it justice. Maybe an unpopular opinion, but I think it feels cheap and underwhelming.
Disagree. The Pinocchio ride is very underrated and works well. The only thing it needs is upgraded lighting like the version in Tokyo.
Pinocchio sure needs an overhaul...such an extraordinary film, the ride doesn't even come close to doing it justice. Maybe an unpopular opinion, but I think it feels cheap and underwhelming.
And some new projection mapping on the wall in the Monstrous scene, those flying seagulls are so dated.Disagree. The Pinocchio ride is very underrated and works well. The only thing it needs is upgraded lighting like the version in Tokyo.
Pinocchio is, IMO, the least interesting and distinctive of all of the dark rides.
The only well-realized environment for me is the Gepetto section at the end. The rest of it just goes on from incident to incident without any real payoff. The colors are largely dark, muted, and ugly, which contrasts with the lushness and beauty of the feature film.
But perhaps I'm in the minority, as someone in a position of authority saw it fit to build the ride THREE TIMES. THREE.
I mean, I understand why Peter Pan was built more than three times, it's iconic.
Snow White, four times? Sure, spookhouse ride, an original.
Mediocre versions of Pooh four times? Sells merchandise. I don't like it, but understand it from an exec level.
Pinocchio, three times?
...?
What does Pinocchio offer that the other rides don't?
It's also a spookhouse ride. It's supposed to be dark and disturbing.
I think the pleasure island scene needs a lot of work (lighting, projections) and could be cut in half. I’d love for them to add an underwater scene even though it wouldn’t make sense. It’s just such a big part of the movie. The soundtrack for the under water scene is iconic and should be incorporated somehow.
Which seems to reinforce that there's nothing particularly distinctive about the ride, especially with your conventional Snow White ride next door. It's redundant and less effective than the older, more historically notable one next door. That is, unless Snow White changes dramatically. Cue the refurb!
That's the answer; if Pinocchio is pivoted to be the only spookhouse ride, than Snow White is free to be reformulated into the frilly princess ride of a merchandiser's dreams.
One is a chase and the other is venturing into a dangerous world. One has a villain chasing you and the other has you running into shady characters and traps at every turn. They are different. Saying they are the same is like saying US is the same as Halloween. Both involve scary people in onesies with sharp objects, but the films are completely different stories and feels.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.