Disney will. Not sure where others stand.Do you think content providers are going to spend serious money on developing for a platform which may or may not be viable?
Especially now and given past history with other types of wearables?
I think many view Apple differently. Apple doesn’t do things that often that aren’t viable. Their misses are pretty few in terms of new devices/markets. Apple was smart to have Disney on stage right off that bat. Surely some other large companies will follow.Do you think content providers are going to spend serious money on developing for a platform which may or may not be viable?
Especially now and given past history with other types of wearables?
I still hate the idea of an Apple Watch and privately ridicule them whenever I see one.I used to hate the idea of an Apple Watch and who would ever buy one of those. How wrong was I….
I guess that's what separates the Steve Jobs era innovations from his successors. Jobs was notorious for being a ruthless perfectionist. I could guarantee you that if you worked at Apple and had told Jobs that it would be be good enough at version 2 or 3 you would have been shown the door very quickly.I get what you’re getting at however we have yet to actually try how this feels. Will it be prefect? Probably not. I’ve already stated I won’t be a day one adopter. Version 2 or 3? Probably and with that better comfortability and displays will surely come just like they have with all devices ever made.
The guy who didn’t include 3G in the iPhone because it was good enough?I guess that's what separates the Steve Jobs era innovations from his successors. Jobs was notorious for being a ruthless perfectionist. I could guarantee you that if you worked at Apple and had told Jobs that it would be be good enough at version 2 or 3 you would have been shown the door very quickly.
This device isn’t bad now. There was a reason Apple waited this long. A headset has been rumored by them for years. Since the google glasses days nearly a decade ago.I guess that's what separates the Steve Jobs era innovations from his successors. Jobs was notorious for being a ruthless perfectionist. I could guarantee you that if you worked at Apple and had told Jobs that it would be be good enough at version 2 or 3 you would have been shown the door very quickly.
I like my Apple Watch, but I primarily use it because I'm a runner to track my runs. The thing is... Macs, iPads, iPhones can all be used passively, sitting on the couch, at the DMV, on the toilet.... AR/VR is active and requires engagement. If it's anything like VR for me, it's a shiny new toy that will get a lot of use in the short term, lose it's luster after a while and knowing how little practical use it has and how much effort is needed to use it, then sit in a closet for months at a time and maybe dusted off for a new experience now and then. But for $3500... I dunno. I don't see it succeeding, at least not as a casual consumer product.I still hate the idea of an Apple Watch and privately ridicule them whenever I see one.
The last thing I need in a world of being always-online between my computer and my phone is to be even more perpetually-connected.
But yes, by all accounts, commercially it has been hugely successful.
That was actually done deliberately because at the time AT&T (The exclusive iPhone service provider) did not have a 3G network in place that was built out well enough to not only support iPhone but give the end user a good experience. So it was nixed.The guy who didn’t include 3G in the iPhone because it was good enough?
I'm going to disagree that Apple's revolutionary products are priced to be somewhat accessible to the mass market from day 1. Going into the not-so-far past, the original iPod was released at $399, the original iPhone at $599 - both far more expensive that other products at the time (and in some ways, more limited than other cheaper options too - iPod only worked with Macs, iPhone didn't have 3G).And it failed miserably because it wasn’t even close to accessible for not only the mass market but also the core Apple customer.
You can’t release a product which will rely on mass market adoption to be successful without making it somewhat accessible to the mass market. All of Apples other revolutionary products were at least within reach of most people on day 1. This is not.
Hugely important, and nobody talks about it.on the toilet
I did not miss it.Did you miss the part where you can see the walls in a lot of use cases? Or all of the technology that would be able to identify walls? This isn’t just a pure VR headset.
The “point” is rather simple.I still don't understand the point of an Apple watch (or similar android wrist device)
AAPL high for the day was at 1PM Eastern right as WWDC kicked off.Apple's 'Vision Pro' priced too high to be innovation for the masses, says BakerAvenue's King Lip
Apple's 'Vision Pro' priced too high to be innovation for the masses, says BakerAvenue's King Lip — CNBC
King Lip, BakerAvenue Wealth management chief strategist, joins 'Closing Bell' to discuss Apple's Vision Pro headset and how it'll impact the market.stocks.apple.com
Indeed. Apple Watch detected an undiagnosed heart condition in a family member of mine. Incredible device that has directly saved the lives of countless wearers.The “point” is rather simple.
A smart watch is an all encompassing device. The health benefits of an Apple Watch are worth it alone IMO. From workout tracking, heart rate, ekg, fall detection, etc. if you’re not an active person I can see why it may not be appealing to you. That said outside of health smart watches of course can store/play music to your Bluetooth devices without needing a phone nearby, you can answer calls and texts without a phone as well. Sleep tracking is big. Keeping it Disney with Apple Watch you can use it like a magicband and have you park ticket loaded on it with magicmobile.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.