I'm still not convinced this is coming. If it does, great, but I've come to a realization: that for all of the complaining about Tomorrowland over the years, I'm not 100% convinced that the land is broken on any level other than aesthetics, and even then it's not as bad as people make it seem.
Yes, do something about the old Carousel theater. Put the rockets back on the podium. But otherwise there's very little that can happen without tearing up the Autopia/Monorail/Subs area, and very little that can I see happening in that area other than just copying and pasting Tron in there, OR they could do like Tokyo and just merge that chunk of real estate into Fantasyland. In the grand scheme of things, Tron is fine as an attraction when considered alone, but I don't see it really doing anything to address the land's flaws (other than giving it something new and shiny), and aesthetically it would be a disaster. Fantasyland certainly doesn't need to be expanded at the expense of any other land.
I guess I'm just not sure what people want or expect with the redo. I get wanting the land to be better. But anyone who thinks that there's any chance modern Disney will get rid of, say, Buzz Lightyear or Star Tours and replace them with "something better" will likely be disappointed. And some people still haven't gotten over the last time Disneyland modified an area that used more land than was arguably justified by the current needs of the park (ROA), so is it really fair to assume that a drastic modification of the monorail/subs/autopia area would be any different this time around?
Food for thought.