Disney settles suit with EPCOT ride builder (from phillyburbs.com)

ilvdisney

New Member
Original Poster
Epcot ride builder settles suits with Disney

By: JOHN ANASTASI The Intelligencer


A five-year legal battle between Upper Southampton's Environmental Tectonics Corp. and the Walt Disney World Co. over the construction of a popular Epcot Center attraction has ended.
The parties announced a settlement Tuesday, but said the deal's terms are confidential and wouldn't be disclosed.
Environmental Tectonics, which Disney hired to build its Mission: Space simulator ride, had sought $15 million in a breach-of-contract suit.
In a joint statement, Disney officials acknowledged the key role Tectonics had played in developing the Disney attraction and Environmental Tectonics' CEO expressed relief the litigation was over.
"We are pleased that we have resolved our differences with Disney on an amicable basis," said company President and CEO William F. Mitchell Sr. "[Environmental Tectonics] was proud to work on Disney's spectacular Mission: Space attraction."
Located in the County Line Industrial Park, Environmental Tectonics designs, develops and installs aircrew training systems. For $25 million, Disney hired the company in 2000 to build the attraction, which simulates spacecraft take-off, zero-gravity space travel, maneuvers and a Mars landing.
Just months before the attraction opened in 2003, Tectonics sued Disney, claiming that Disney had removed the company from the job after design and contract changes pushed the cost to nearly $45 million. Environmental Tectonics claimed Disney failed to pay the company $15 million.
Disney responded with its own lawsuit, claiming that Tectonics did a poor job and misrepresented the project's total cost. It sought $47 million to $72 million in damages.
In 2005, while the 2003 litigation was still unfolding, Environmental Tectonics filed a second lawsuit. That suit accused Disney of downplaying the company's role in creating the attraction and showing "utter disrespect" for its intellectual property. It leveled further breach-of-contract and unfair competition claims.
The court dismissed the suit in March, but Environmental Tectonics was appealing the ruling.
Tuesday's settlement resolves both the 2003 lawsuits and 2005 case.
"Disney very much appreciates the role that [Environmental Tectonics] played in the design and development of Mission: Space," said Peter Steinman, senior vice president for Walt Disney Imagineering. "The centrifuge technology expertise and experience that [it] brought to the project was very important."
John Anastasi can be reached at 215-949-4170 or janastasi@phillyBurbs.com.
 

DisneyMusician2

Well-Known Member
I love this ride, and I also was a big fan of horizons. The green side hardly does the concept justice.

To me, and to some former astronauts, this is the closest thing you can get to actually strapping yourself to the rocket.

I may be in the minority, but this one is a must-ride for me and the family.
 

tomm4004

New Member
So this company built the ride. Disney's contribution was recycling the movie from Star Tours and lighting Gary Sinise badly. Oh yes, and the wonderful white exit hallway that gives you that Mars atmosphere.
 

wdwmagic

Administrator
Moderator
Premium Member
So this company built the ride. Disney's contribution was recycling the movie from Star Tours and lighting Gary Sinise badly. Oh yes, and the wonderful white exit hallway that gives you that Mars atmosphere.


Ahhh no, you are a long way off there.
 

joel_maxwell

Permanent Resident of EPCOT
It really is a dud. I most likely wont go on it in future trips....its just a waste of time. And its an insult to horizons!
this comment doesnt make sense. M:S isnt responsible for the Horizons debacle. You cant compare the two.... now, since they were built in different decades (20 years apart) under completely different circumstances. Nothing will ever top Horizons since it is gone. It's nostalgia has doubled in value since it is lost forever.

I understand your basic thought process here, but saying it is an insult doesnt make sense since it isnt the original attraction but refurbed. IE: you could say that the current version of JIYI is an insult to the original version.

sorry to be so technical.... :wave:
 

Enigma

Account Suspended
i do agree that it limits itself to evolve over time. Updating "the mission" is about it. I doubt the exit queue will ever be anything but white walls.

There were so many extremly cool pitches and plans for a really good space pavillion for epcot and they ended up picking the worst one and slashed the budgets of even that.

One plan would have been similar to Wonders of Life with multiple smaller attractions including a cablecar ride that simulated floating around in spcae as well as a simulator adventure.
 

SirNim

Well-Known Member
I think the interesting question to ponder here is, knowing everything that has happened with M:S (hindsight is 20/20, of course), the critical and fan reactions, the ETC lawsuit, the publicity, the reaction to the publicity by creating a new ride "experience" by disabling the centrifugal spin on the Green side—would M:S have been built again in its original configuration, or would a tamer alternative proposal have been developed?
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom