It's comments like that that are directly attributable to the reason the park is barely getting a gain in new attractions.Yeah, I get that it's better to add than replace, but, for me, they can't replace TGMR fast enough.
It's comments like that that are directly attributable to the reason the park is barely getting a gain in new attractions.
I was just on TGMR today, some notes:
It seems that they now have someone other then the original car-host play the temple priest. Rather than the priest taking off her robe and revealing our original driver, the priest ducks into a room and our driver pops out of the room 'covered by smoke'. To someone new to the ride, they probably didn't get that it was supposed to be our driver under those robes.
OK, I understand that when Disney Events holds events in TGMR, that they may need a mic in the Oz room. But don't have the mic's cord visibly draped over the set... bad show.
There's a Yeti Watch thread... so, why isn't there a thread waiting for them to fix the Busby Berkeley section? Oh yeah, because TGMR is a huge disappointment (other than the Oz scene) and it will happily pass into history. Yeah, I get that it's better to add than replace, but, for me, they can't replace TGMR fast enough.
But why not update it rather than replace? Every problem you listed can be fixed with a solid update to the ride, I see no reason why it should just be completely abandoned for a new ride.Yeah, I get that it's better to add than replace, but, for me, they can't replace TGMR fast enough.
I agree... Update, rewrite the script, replace som,e scenes but keep the heart of the park intact... Then build an all new Mickey Ride in the Animation Courtyard where it belongs...That just makes sense... They could even create an attached Toontown side corridor connecting to the RockNrollercoaster plaza... Then you would pass through the Disney Studios gate into the Disney Studios original properties...Animation and all. The central core of the park would still have the 1940s Golden Age of Hollywood narrative.... Classic Hollywood in the center section of the park, Animation on the right side of the park (Classic Disney and Pixar) Science fiction and Star Wars on the left side of the park...But why not update it rather than replace? Every problem you listed can be fixed with a solid update to the ride, I see no reason why it should just be completely abandoned for a new ride.
Unless it's more that you just don't like the concept of GMR in general, which is fine. But even though it needs an update, I love it for the fact that it really encompasses the theme of the park and would work much better as a thesis attraction. Plus when it leaves there's going to be very few attractions left that fit in the theme of old Hollywood, rather than just "it fits in Hollywood because it's an IP".
What about the long queue for TGMR that already exists? On my last visit in the fall, I waited for 45 minutes for TGMR. While you may not be a fan, it's still seen by many as the flagship ride of the entire park, and draws crowds every day.I'll be happy to see TGMR replaced, but they better add even more to DHS because the attractions that exist are too paltry in number and have too long of a queue.
Sad day. I've been watching him for many years on TCM. He made the classic movies great with his introductions.On a side note, Robert Osborne just passed away today...
The Great Movie Ride has been allowed to deteriorate in the same way that the Studio Backlot Tour was. That latter was a cut in size, the former was largely a cut in relevance. I would love to see The Great Movie Ride updated with additional rides like the LPS Mickey ride go elsewhere, but at this point I'm ok with TGMR closing.It's comments like that that are directly attributable to the reason the park is barely getting a gain in new attractions.
I'm not quite clear as to why a celebration of classic movies has 'deteriorated in relevance'. Are The Wizard of Oz, gangster movies, and Casablanca less relevant now than they were in 1996?The Great Movie Ride has been allowed to deteriorate in the same way that the Studio Backlot Tour was. That latter was a cut in size, the former was largely a cut in relevance
Because millennials nowadays, due to technology, have the attention span of a gnat, and anything that happened more than a few years ago is ancient history to be ignored and ridiculed.I'm not quite clear as to why a celebration of classic movies has 'deteriorated in relevance'. Are The Wizard of Oz, gangster movies, and Casablanca less relevant now than they were in 1996?
Why is everyone always bashing millennials? My daughter can quote not only most of the movies in the ride, but many in the ending film montage, as well. Her friends are great, too. My house is routinely filled to the brim with that generation, and they are typically smart, engaged, caring, and committed people - not a "snowflake" in the bunch.Because millennials nowadays, due to technology, have the attention span of a gnat, and anything that happened more than a few years ago is ancient history to be ignored and ridiculed.
Because millennials nowadays, due to technology, have the attention span of a gnat, and anything that happened more than a few years ago is ancient history to be ignored and ridiculed.
Blame the millennials...And there it is. Whatever the problem, blame the millennials.
Blame the millennials...
... but thank the Phoenitians.
No, but the animatronics haven't been updated since 1989, the script has been dumbed down, and only the finale film has been updated from both content and image quality.I'm not quite clear as to why a celebration of classic movies has 'deteriorated in relevance'. Are The Wizard of Oz, gangster movies, and Casablanca less relevant now than they were in 1996?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.