Bairstow
Well-Known Member
Hard to say if they even classify as true animatronics.
Hey, if these things qualify...
![Enchanted%20Tiki%20Room%2024.jpg](http://land.allears.net/blogs/jackspence/Enchanted%20Tiki%20Room%2024.jpg)
Hard to say if they even classify as true animatronics.
And like they're planning to with Frozen, Tokyo actually put effort into their MI ride. Look, the figures are fully animated and the facade and queue are perfect at immersing you into the setting. Additionally, it's not a stupid book report ride, but a sequel.
Agree, the cut outs of the facade also look awfulHard to say if they even classify as true animatronics.
And that's a nice way of saying it. Let's hope there is never another Disney ride that is that bad.Ahhhh, Superstar Limo. The trashiest, piece of poo ride ever. It is SHOCKING to me that Disney put even a cent into this.
Those can actually move their mouths to audio though.Hey, if these things qualify...
![]()
That's not in the song... the lyrics that come to mind are... "Money... it's a crime"
Rather fitting, no?
Its a sign.
Get your money for nothing, tourists for free.How about Dire Straits "Money for nothing" or Steve Miller Band "Take the Money and Run" LOL!
"You are limited to purchasing only 5 pieces of Frozen merchandise a day!"
If it had laser guns...
The queue is actually a good thing to bring up. If that rumor is true and they'll be completely redoing it and making the current unload area a combination load/unload area and the current load area will be a new show scene that's even more money from the budget. Add in whatever is done to the rest of the pavilion and $75M is going to go quickly. Since it seems they were dead set on doing this they could've at least gone for a much bigger budget. It would still sting EPCOT Center fans just the same but at least the ride wouldn't have been cheap.
I addressed that in my last line. I still would've hated the decision and placement but at least I would know the ride wouldn't just be some cheap replacement. As a comparison I would feel that same way if the Ratatouille ride (exactly as it is in WDSP) was announced for the France pavilion. I could argue the placement but I wouldn't be able to say it's just a cheap decision.Come on be honest....$150 million and you would find reason to doubt this ride
Like I said I would take a equal ride with a better queue and call it a win.
I addressed that in my last line. I still would've hated the decision and placement but at least I would know the ride wouldn't just be some cheap replacement. As a comparison I would feel that same way if the Ratatouille ride (exactly as it is in WDSP) was announced for the France pavilion. I could argue the placement but I wouldn't be able to say it's just a cheap decision.
Come on be honest....$150 million and you would find reason to doubt this ride
Like I said I would take a equal ride with a better queue and call it a win.
That would still be a loss because it's replacing a ride about a real country with one about a fictional one.
Since it's a fictional one heavily based on Norway it fits IMO. But I was talking about the ride quality itself, not the theme it is built around.
Can't really separate the two. The theme doesn't fit were it is being put which makes it a net loss for the park. It would sort of be like putting Star Tours in Animal Kingdom.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.