StageFrenzy
Well-Known Member
I dunno if this has been discussed here before but why is "Despicable Me" showing on Disney Channel?
Same reason the harry potter franchise marathons on ABC Family.
I dunno if this has been discussed here before but why is "Despicable Me" showing on Disney Channel?
I dunno if this has been discussed here before but why is "Despicable Me" showing on Disney Channel?
Same reason the harry potter franchise marathons on ABC Family.
Because Disney Channel has no IP anyone cares about so they need SOMETHING to boost their ratings, I find it rich in irony that Disney has to show UNIVERSAL IP because they have NOTHING recent which anyone cares about.
With the exception of John Carter and the Lone Ranger which are the canonical examples of how NOT to make a movie However they did achieve the previously impossible task of making 'Xanadu' and 'Heaven's Gate' look like masterworks...
It was, essentially, poor maintenance. The ropes that tie the rubber portion to the base of the rafte were loose and caught on to the pipe. The same thing happened a few months later at Six Flags New Engalnd. This happened after Premier Parks purchased the Six Flags chain and started downsizing the maintenance staff. But even so, there were always employees positioned around the ride path. In my experience, Disney is the only company that doesn't (seemingly relying on cameras instead, which is ineffective against guests purposefully misbehaving).I'll confess to being completely unfamiliar with raft ride safety mechanisms. But on intuition, I'd say that you can not hope to overturn an upside down raft by manpower anyway. The best remedie is not a few lifeguards (they're not Superman), but a plug to quickly drain the water to prevent drowning.
If I recall, Harry Potter films were shown on ABC Family long before WWoHP. So if we are going to tie that into the notion of Disney showing Universal IP because they have nothing else to show, I don't think it qualifies.
And in regards to showing Despicable Me, that is kinda odd. But I don't think it was shown due to lack of Disney IPs that people care about. I think that's a stretch considering they have at their disposal several Pixar films that could be randomly selected and people would watch. They also have a few new animation films such as Tangled, Meet the Robinsons, etc that I have seen on the channel as well. And in addition to all that, the late 80s-90s era classic Disney animation films that never get old, and original Disney channel movies.
That's why I find it odd they showed Despicable Me. Though, there could be deals behind the curtain that we don't know about. For instance, The Office is shown on Fox and TBS, however it originally aired on NBC. Same with Seinfeld. Aired on NBC but shown on different channels. I think that could be more of a plausible answer rather than the idea they have no IPs that people care about.
I just don't know why we're still fighting over whose stock is more secure based on television channels... /snip
Just ignore it..I just don't know why we're still fighting over whose stock is more secure based on television channels. All I care about is which theme park is gonna give me the most bang for my buck.
I do. He is just an obvious troll. And not even a good one. I don't know why anyone responds to Thick's Schtick.Just ignore it..
Um, do you really think if Comcast or Disney's stock tanked they would be building anything?
So yes, in a way, television revenue kinda does matter, like it or not it effects how much bang for your buck you get.
Well, this isn't too shabby!When either stock tanks, let me know. Till then I'ma go enjoy myself.
Well, this isn't too shabby!
YahooFinance just named Disney the company of the year for 2013 !
"Disney (DIS) is a 90-year-old company that's also the first brand most two-year olds learn to love. The company was built on hand-drawn cartoons, yet its interactive Disney Animated program was Apple Inc.’s (AAPL) “2013 App of the Year” for the iPad.
The Walt Disney co. has honored the past, delivered in the present and positioned for the future better than any other American company. It's the company's successful striking of this rare balance – while focusing on careful financial stewardship and great customer experiences – that helped Disney edge out all others to be named this year's Yahoo Finance Company of the Year.
For the second year, our editors and writers used a blend of quantitative and subjective standards to recognize one company for its financial performance, shareholder friendliness, strategic focus, employee relations and customer loyalty.
Disney did not have the most stellar stock performance in the Dow Jones industrials or even its industry. Other big companies had greater gains in earnings or more headline-winning product launches. Netflix (NFLX), Tesla Motors Inc. (TSLA) and Facebook Inc. (FB) all captivated growth investors’ attention more dramatically, to name just three worthy of consideration.
We closely considered two other companies that performed well against big perceived challenges: Mattel Inc. (MAT) continues to exploit the growing overseas toy market and shares its copious cash flow with investors, despite worries traditional toys are on the wane. And Boeing Inc. (BA) overcame threatening quality issues with batteries on its crucial new Dreamliner jet to secure bountiful new orders and stand as a huge investor winner.
But no company other than Disney delivered so much consistent quality in its products, produced more-balanced growth with global reach or shared more cash with investors while also investing for future growth.
Here are highlights from Disney’s 2013:
- Revenue and profits reached new highs for a third straight year. Disney shares have gained 38% for the year, more than ten percentage points better than the broad market, and have doubled over the past two years.
- Film releases generated the best box-office results in Disney history, with $4 billion in ticket sales heading into the holiday-movie season.
- Company theme parks in California, Florida, Tokyo and Hong Kong posted record attendance.
- The consumer-products division posted its first $1 billion profit year – without fully benefiting from the Star Wars bonanza to come following its Lucasfilm acquisition.
- Disney cable networks led ratings for kids aged 2 to 11.
- The company repurchased $4.1 billion in shares in fiscal 2013 and raised the common-stock dividend by 15%.
- Disney once again ranked third among 60 leading U.S. companies in Harris Interactive’s Reputation Quotient survey, which encompasses factors including product quality, trust, social responsibility and treatment of employees. In a small but significant gesture, as Obamacare took effect, Disney offered full-time positions to select part-time park employees so they could get health benefits...."
Be careful DH... Being a troll on WDWMagic is perfectly fine... But calling the obvious troll a troll isnt... Expect a warning in 3... 2... 1...I do. He is just an obvious troll. And not even a good one. I don't know why anyone responds to Thick's Schtick.
That may well be true, but, the argument only continues because we let it by responding and attempting to contradict over and over. Stop joining in and the posts will stop as well. Simple math. There are no winners in continuing the discussion with no end.I'd agree in general, except Mr. Thick (and others) consistently return to the well of invalid/pointless arguments and points even though many here (myself included) have spent far too much time setting things straight, which may not be trolling, but certainly a contrarian style. A great example is the oft-used attendance numbers argument, seemingly a favorite of Mr. Thick's. Board contrarians are as useful as a troll, IMO, not much difference.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.