DarkMetroid567
Well-Known Member
This might be the optimal box office outcome for Disney fans. Moana 2 and Mufasa are performing well but it should be clear to Disney that they left money on the table here.
I can’t agree on Moana 2 showing Disney left money on the table when they saw turning that from a Disney+ series that no one would watch to a movie that would make money back big time was the smart financial move.This might be the optimal box office outcome for Disney fans. Moana 2 and Mufasa are performing well but it should be clear to Disney that they left money on the table here.
And this is what I meant when I said that the CinemaScore is a broken scale. If the only worthwhile result is an A, why have the rest of the scale at all?
It's as if the public is saying, "What? People aren't saying it's the greatest movie of all-time? Then I won't see it." Which given box office trends is perhaps, disappointingly, a true interpretation of how the zeitgeist works.
How so? It's playing ultra-wide in theaters around the world at the biggest time of year for the box office in many countries. I'm not sure how it would be performing better unless it wasn't going up against a title that seems to appeal more to actual children. It's rather like what happened last year with Wish, which kids were passing over in favor of Trolls Band Together, Migration, and especially Wonka.But Mufasa, yeah, they left money on the table with that movie.
This might be the optimal box office outcome for Disney fans. Moana 2 and Mufasa are performing well but it should be clear to Disney that they left money on the table here.
Exactly! I mean, it’s still going to make them money, but not a lot of it.I don’t know if that’s quite the lesson to take from Mufasa. That’s more a case of they shouldn’t have made it. Which I think has been clear to many of us for a while.
Yeah. I think depends on what the frame of reference is. I agree with you, comparing Moana 2 to what it was going to be. But given what a Moana sequel could have been, I think Disney did leave money on the table. I think the same applies to Mufasa. The Lion King is considered a masterpiece for Disney and the remake made tons of money. Mufasa should be running away with the box office IMO.I can’t agree on Moana 2 showing Disney left money on the table when they saw turning that from a Disney+ series that no one would watch to a movie that would make money back big time was the smart financial move.
But Mufasa, yeah, they left money on the table with that movie.
I get what you're saying here -- imagine if Moana 2 had been more than "fine" for most viewers, how much better it might have done. If there's a zeitgeist-capturing, chatter-inspiring blockbuster this season, it's Wicked Part I, even if the box office numbers are bigger for Moana 2. And Zootopia 2 is going up against Wicked: For Good next Thanksgiving...WDFAS needs to step up its game to compete.Yeah. I think depends on what the frame of reference is. I agree with you, comparing Moana 2 to what it was going to be. But given what a Moana sequel could have been, I think Disney did leave money on the table.
Unrelated to your point, but my gut tells me Zootopia 2 is doing Inside Out 2 numbers, especially abroad. Whereas Wicked will do very well but will probably have worse legs than part one.I get what you're saying here -- imagine if Moana 2 had been more than "fine" for most viewers, how much better it might have done. If there's a zeitgeist-capturing, chatter-inspiring blockbuster this season, it's Wicked Part I, even if the box office numbers are bigger for Moana 2. And Zootopia 2 is going up against Wicked: For Good next Thanksgiving...WDFAS needs to step up its game to compete.
I think Wicked Part 2 will make slightly more money than part 1, but it will be more front loaded as people won't be "discovering" Wicked throughout the holiday season — the fanbase will be already established. So I think Part 2 will have a much bigger opening than part 1 ($160-$200 millionish opening weekend), but then it will have a steep drop off in the following weekends.Unrelated to your point, but my gut tells me Zootopia 2 is doing Inside Out 2 numbers, especially abroad. Whereas Wicked will do very well but will probably have worse legs than part one.
I doubt that they’ll be that rough.The next few months are going to be rough for Disney.
I would be shocked (wouldn’t be the first time) if it did Inside Out 2 numbers. Inside Out 1 was considered by many to be one of the last great Pixar titles, an emotional piece that was heartfelt and amusing; it enjoyed critical acclaim in a way that WDAS and Zootopia haven’t enjoyed.Unrelated to your point, but my gut tells me Zootopia 2 is doing Inside Out 2 numbers, especially abroad. Whereas Wicked will do very well but will probably have worse legs than part one.
To paraphrase the Timekeeper, if Captain America bombs Burbank’s pants will be full.Besides, the only films that might disappoint for Disney and bomb are Captain America: Brave New World and Snow White.
Zootopia was acclaimed at the time and is still generally well-regarded, although it's commentary on racism hasn't aged the best in a post 2020 world.I would be shocked (wouldn’t be the first time) if it did Inside Out 2 numbers. Inside Out 1 was considered by many to be one of the last great Pixar titles, an emotional piece that was heartfelt and amusing; it enjoyed critical acclaim in a way that WDAS and Zootopia haven’t enjoyed.
I think CinemaScore is more of a test of "did the audience get what they thought they were paying for?" There have been many great movies with bad cinemascores, usually because the movies took bold swings that pushed audiences out of their comfort zone or the movies were mismarketed and the movie people ended up seeing was very different from what they were expecting based on the trailers.Though, CinemaScore can be misleading at times. The Nightmare Before Christmas got a bad B+ score. Probably because opening night audiences didn't know what to make of it. But then it later got high critic and audience scores and became a beloved classic (and even made a profit at the BO).
They’ll get over it once The Fantastic 4 makes a billion and Thunderbolts* is a success with $450-$500M WW on a $150M budget.To paraphrase the Timekeeper, if Captain America bombs Burbank’s pants will be full.
I would be shocked (wouldn’t be the first time) if it did Inside Out 2 numbers. Inside Out 1 was considered by many to be one of the last great Pixar titles, an emotional piece that was heartfelt and amusing; it enjoyed critical acclaim in a way that WDAS and Zootopia haven’t enjoyed.
I mean anything’s possible but I don’t think the IP is in the same realm as Inside Out or even Moana.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.