Dune Part 2 is a much better movie than Mufasa, but glad to see Mufasa prove that movies can still have legs in this day and age even after a weak opening weekend.
C'mon, now. Meryl Streep wasn't Meryl Streep when she was 23 years old, either.Zegler has a good voice but she's no Meryl Streep either. She was only okay in Spielberg's mediocre West Side Story. The lack of chemistry between Tony and Maria is also on her, not just Ansel Elgort.
Will I be able to say that in 6 years after she becomes obscure again and isn't nominated for any Academy Awards?C'mon, now. Meryl Streep wasn't Meryl Streep when she was 23 years old, either.Trying to compare a 23 year old relatively new actress to someone who has been doing it for 50 years is ridiculous.
Streep got her first Oscar nomination at 29 for The Deer Hunter, and she won the following year for Kramer vs Kramer.C'mon, now. Meryl Streep wasn't Meryl Streep when she was 23 years old, either.Trying to compare a 23 year old relatively new actress to someone who has been doing it for 50 years is ridiculous.
I never look at critic reviews. The audience scores are always far more reliable. Although in this case it could have 100% audience score and I would skip it.This is why I typically wait for the audience score over early previews and critics, unfortunately I think the audience score is going to be worthless on this one due to trolling.
I’m sure some of my friends will see it so they’ll ultimately be my guide on this one.
Zegler has a good voice but she's no Meryl Streep either. She was only okay in Spielberg's mediocre West Side Story. The lack of chemistry between Tony and Maria is also on her, not just Ansel Elgort.
I'm not the one who started comparing actresses to Meryl StreepWait, are you really comparing Zegler to Meryl Streep?? One is at the relative start of her career and the other has been acting for decades.
I'm not sure why the comparison was made anyway (it seems a bit random and irrelevant), but I don't think its unreasonable to deem Streep the superior actor. That's not a slight on Zegler; few actors can match Streep in range and talent.C'mon, now. Meryl Streep wasn't Meryl Streep when she was 23 years old, either.Trying to compare a 23 year old relatively new actress to someone who has been doing it for 50 years is ridiculous.
My initial reply to you was deleted, so let me try again:That's it?
She only needs to release a TikTok saying "Sorry you guys were offended!"? You wouldn't try to quantify how badly that idiotic behavior by your employee damaged your company's brand and product line she was representing? I would.
At the very least, I would place her on an immediate leave of absence while I tried to assess how bad the damage was that she had caused to the company's sales and the brand image. Because there's a lot of other employees who don't do idiotic TikTok stunts who are depending on working for a profitable company to support their families.
I'd imagine within two weeks time I'd have made that assessment, had my T's crossed by HR and my I's dotted by Legal, and she wouldn't be working for my company after that kind of bizarrely idiotic public stunt.
Here:I'm not sure why the comparison was made anyway (it seems a bit random and irrelevant), but I don't think its unreasonable to deem Streep the superior actor. That's not a slight on Zegler; few actors can match Streep in range and talent.
What frustrates me about the whole ordeal is the fans mocking Zegler over her acting ability and claiming Gadot is better. I think criticizing Zegler's statements and personality is fair game, but I'm sorry, I'm not going to play along with this alternate reality where we pretend she's a bad actress and that Gadot is the next Meryl Streep. Clearly, not enough people saw Spielberg's version of West Side Story.
I didn't refer to your post.Here:
Not sure why the context of why Meryl Streep was in my post keeps being ignored by various users around here.
To be fair, the first poster who brought up Meryl Streep was creating and attacking a straw man. As one might expect, this caused a dust up. The bottom line is that no one is saying Gal Gadot is the next Meryl Streep and no one is saying Rachel Zegler is the next Meryl Streep. Everyone seems to be in agreement with that.I think it’s because you misconstrued the meaning of @Ghost93 ’s post. He wasn’t making an actual comparison but was pointing out how silly it would be.
It doesn’t matter what the real numbers are. The access media just needs to be able to spin some type of success story. Maybe they will trumpet about how it makes more than the 1937 film as if inflation doesn’t exist.Should Disney have made Snow - No, but you can make a list of movies they should not have made.
Will Snow make 1B - No
Will Snow break even - I think it will break even or make a little given the access media numbers. And really that's all Disney wants out of this at this point.
NOTE: The real numbers to make Snow with the reshoots and the actual cost to market is unknown.
Exactly. I didn’t mean to say otherwise. It wasn’t so much a straw man though because he wasn’t making an actual comparison.To be fair, the first poster who brought up Meryl Streep was creating and attacking a straw man. As one might expect, this caused a dust up. The bottom line is that no one is saying Gal Gadot is the next Meryl Streep and no one is saying Rachel Zegler is the next Meryl Streep. Everyone seems to be in agreement with that.
At this point no one knows if it’s spin or the movie is actually good.It doesn’t matter what the real numbers are. The access media just needs to be able to spin some type of success story. Maybe they will trumpet about how it makes more than the 1937 film as if inflation doesn’t exist.
Good point - this will absolutely happen! So for Disney, mission accomplished!!!It doesn’t matter what the real numbers are. The access media just needs to be able to spin some type of success story. Maybe they will trumpet about how it makes more than the 1937 film as if inflation doesn’t exist.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.