• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

Disney (and others) at the Box Office - Current State of Affairs

brideck

Well-Known Member
The only bright spot I can see is that Greta Gerwig is listed as one of the screenwriters. I liked Barbie so I’m sort of excited to see if this is good also.

Yeah, and the other screenwriter wrote Secretary (among other things) back in the day, so this has the potential to be a good, more modern adaptation, but it's probably been tinkered with a bunch in post. Marc Webb is also an interesting choice as director. It's been awhile since there's been anything on the big screen from him, but he certainly knows how to shoot music videos.

Between that and new original songs by the Dear Evan Hansen/Greatest Showman/Spirited team there really should be a workable approach to marketing this that they could find. If they've stuck to their guns, it should absolutely appeal to the female-forward audience that Barbie and Wicked have capitalized on.
 

Vegas Disney Fan

Well-Known Member
Between that and new original songs by the Dear Evan Hansen/Greatest Showman/Spirited team there really should be a workable approach to marketing this that they could find. If they've stuck to their guns, it should absolutely appeal to the female-forward audience that Barbie and Wicked have capitalized on.
In the last 2 weeks I’ve seen more commercials for this movie than any other Disney movie in probably the last 5 years, I’ve been watching High Potential on Hulu though so maybe that’s skewed what I’ve seen, and all the commercials I’ve seen have been very nostalgic in their approach, had I not read about the changes here I’d assume this was a more or less shot for shot remake… nothing about the commercials I’ve seen have given me a Barbie or Wicked vibe.
 

brideck

Well-Known Member
In the last 2 weeks I’ve seen more commercials for this movie than any other Disney movie in probably the last 5 years, I’ve been watching High Potential on Hulu though so maybe that’s skewed what I’ve seen, and all the commercials I’ve seen have been very nostalgic in their approach, had I not read about the changes here I’d assume this was a more or less shot for shot remake… nothing about the commercials I’ve seen have given me a Barbie or Wicked vibe.

I don't disagree, which makes me wonder what on earth they're doing. Modern Disney is nothing if not always afraid to stick to their convictions (or initial ideas, if you'd rather I didn't personify them as having beliefs at all).
 

Chi84

Premium Member
In the last 2 weeks I’ve seen more commercials for this movie than any other Disney movie in probably the last 5 years, I’ve been watching High Potential on Hulu though so maybe that’s skewed what I’ve seen, and all the commercials I’ve seen have been very nostalgic in their approach, had I not read about the changes here I’d assume this was a more or less shot for shot remake… nothing about the commercials I’ve seen have given me a Barbie or Wicked vibe.
If the reviews reveal it’s just a shot for shot remake I’ll probably wait to see it at home.
 

Chi84

Premium Member
Here ya go!

Well, there never is any relationship between the prince and Snow White. He’s on screen for 3 minutes to sing a song and then kiss her at the end. That’s it. So I kind of get what she’s saying.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member

Disney Irish

Premium Member
Well, there never is any relationship between the prince and Snow White. He’s on screen for 3 minutes to sing a song and then kiss her at the end. That’s it. So I kind of get what she’s saying.
Here's the thing, first its a quote taken out of context and second she never said the original in its entirety is "creepy", in fact I don't believe she even says the word "creepy" as all. She is talking about a single scene that lasts all of like 30 seconds in a 83min movie.
 

Chi84

Premium Member
Here's the thing, first its a quote taken out of context and second she never said the original in its entirety is "creepy", in fact I don't believe she even says the word "creepy" as all. She is talking about a single scene that lasts all of like 30 seconds in a 83min movie.
No she said weird but I think she’s identifying the difference between a short animated film where there’s no relationship explained and a live action film where that wouldn’t happen.
 

easyrowrdw

Well-Known Member
Here's the thing, first its a quote taken out of context and second she never said the original in its entirety is "creepy", in fact I don't believe she even says the word "creepy" as all. She is talking about a single scene that lasts all of like 30 seconds in a 83min movie.
I didn't hear her use the words creepy either, but I don't think her statements were taken out of context. I found the original interview in full and don't see anything that changes the meaning of what she said.
Correct she didn’t, people just look for reasons to be upset.

There is plenty in this world to be upset about, this isn’t one of them.
"The original cartoon came out in 1937, and very evidently so. There's a big focus on her love story with a guy who literally stalks her. Weird! Weird!"

That's the quote that bothers people. I don't think her statements are an accurate description of the original movie so I can understand why someone who loves the movie would be upset by it. I can't know anyone's motives though.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
I didn't hear her use the words creepy either, but I don't think her statements were taken out of context. I found the original interview in full and don't see anything that changes the meaning of what she said.

"The original cartoon came out in 1937, and very evidently so. There's a big focus on her love story with a guy who literally stalks her. Weird! Weird!"

That's the quote that bothers people. I don't think her statements are an accurate description of the original movie so I can understand why someone who loves the movie would be upset by it. I can't know anyone's motives though.
If people want to be upset and outraged, go ahead, but at least do it based on something real not some made up manufactured clickbait title of an article where they didn't even listen to the actual quote which is right in the article. The poster claimed someone said the original was "creepy", and when pressed on who actually said it was "creepy" produced that article as evidence of that being said, and no where in anything she said was the word "creepy" ever uttered. So its clear that poster is only going based on a clickbait article and not what was actually said, ie something made up, manufactured, and untrue.

Also she is talking about a 30 second scene from a 1937 83 minute movie, 30 seconds people. People have lost the meaning of what she is actually saying because they want to be outraged. Instead of focusing on the actual meaning, which is the original was a product of its time and we're modernizing it to bring it forward, and rather than focus on romantic love we're focusing on Snow herself and giving her more agency. Also just so its not lost, no where does she say that a love story is being completely removed, just that its not the primary focus of the movie anymore. In fact I take that to mean that there will be a love story, just not one based on a 30 second "meet cute" in the forest by a Prince who just appears out of nowhere.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom