Disney (and others) at the Box Office - Current State of Affairs

Tony the Tigger

Well-Known Member
Actually that’s exactly what people are saying… and people keep throwing out inferences that innuendo that there must be some reason more… challenging that people can’t just be uninterested.
In many cases, there absolutely is reason more. Read less policed sites. Also use common sense.
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
In many cases, there absolutely is reason more. Read less policed sites. Also use common sense.
So there you go… only you are the anointed ones that have opinions that are pure. Others, they are always suspect… based purely on your disagreement. Im talking about people’s actions here… not other sites.

You’ve shown your cards.
 

Chi84

Premium Member
So there you go… only you are the anointed ones that have opinions that are pure. Others, they are always suspect… based purely on your disagreement. Im talking about people’s actions here… not other sites.

You’ve shown your cards.
That’s not fair. Other people on this very site have said ugly things that were deleted. The fact that you didn’t see them doesn’t mean they didn’t exist. There’s a basis for the suspicion whether people want to acknowledge it or not.
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
Of course that is how it should be, but it’s almost never how things work on these sites. People misremember who said what. It’s a simple correction (that wasn’t me) and no reason to get upset.
No, people are using the reasoning that some have acted that way, so it’s reasonable to act broadly and prejudge others. This is not wrong guy…’ situation — it’s a rationalization of behavior. Behavior even you have said shouldn’t be.
 

Chi84

Premium Member
No, people are using the reasoning that some have acted that way, so it’s reasonable to act broadly and prejudge others. This is not wrong guy…’ situation — it’s a rationalization of behavior. Behavior even you have said shouldn’t be.
I haven’t seen anyone say that because some have acted badly it’s reasonable to prejudge others. It’s possible someone has, but if so that doesn’t make sense and is clearly wrong.

Again, if someone has been treated unfairly, it’s simple enough to just say so and clarify your opinion to alleviate misunderstanding.
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
I haven’t seen anyone say that because some have acted badly it’s reasonable to prejudge others.

The retort to pointing out the behavior was literally pointing to that the behavior was legitimate because of other people’s actions elsewhere in other situations.

“In many cases, there absolutely is reason more. Read less policed sites”

That is exactly what that kind of deflection is doing. It’s no different then saying a stereotype or prejudice is fine because it’s true for some people.

It’s possible someone has, but if so that doesn’t make sense and is clearly wrong.

Which is why I called it out.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Ummm....no.
Ummm…


 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Actually there are some analysts saying it could happen and that it will be close… it is not really about how poor Wish is doing…Wish is still falling within projections… and I think will still succeed…it is more about Hunger Games having a much stronger hold then originally projected
Low end again…
…and it won’t cover…not close
 

Tha Realest

Well-Known Member
… it is not really about how poor Wish is doing…Wish is still falling within projections… and I think will still succeed…it is more about Hunger Games having a much stronger hold then originally projected
The projections have continued to drop, and the current projections would’ve been a “worst case” scenario a week or two ago.
Two weeks ago it was projected to make $57-86M over the five day weekend.
 

Jedijax719

Well-Known Member
Ummm…


Boxofficepro is saying
Hunger Games: $20.5 million 3-day, $29.8 million 5-day
Wish: $37 million 3-day, $56 million 5-day
Those numbers aren't even close. And Deadline never knows what the blazing saddles it is doing.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Boxofficepro is saying
Hunger Games: $20.5 million 3-day, $29.8 million 5-day
Wish: $37 million 3-day, $56 million 5-day
Those numbers aren't even close. And Deadline never knows what the blazing saddles it is doing.
That was 2 days ago…
They’ve been revised down

Details are a devil
 

Tha Realest

Well-Known Member
Boxofficepro is saying
Hunger Games: $20.5 million 3-day, $29.8 million 5-day
Wish: $37 million 3-day, $56 million 5-day
Those numbers aren't even close. And Deadline never knows what the blazing saddles it is doing.
You’re operating off of old numbers. Deadline has the current ones as of this afternoon:
1700801706352.png
 

_caleb

Well-Known Member
Actually that’s exactly what people are saying… and people keep throwing out inferences and innuendo that there must be some reason more… challenging that people can’t just be uninterested.
If you say you don’t like a particular film, and we ask why not, are you seeing that as a challenge? I would truly hope not.

And if you explain why not and your explanation raises more questions and we ask those questions, are you seeing that as a challenge? To me, these are just part of conversation about films.

And if your responses to these questions come across as vaguely similar to something bad people might say, would you prefer we not say so? Is that what you mean by challenge?

I’m trying to understand.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom