SirLink
Well-Known Member
Photo Dave according to screamscape DHS is only going to add 2 Star Wars attractions so the hope for a Star Wars land is not very likely. Lance Hart knows his stuff.
He doesn't ...
Photo Dave according to screamscape DHS is only going to add 2 Star Wars attractions so the hope for a Star Wars land is not very likely. Lance Hart knows his stuff.
How better to bring our classics to other cultures?
I'm not sure how "dark rides" is even defined these days. We're not talking "Mr Toad's Wild Ride" any longer. Spiderman at Universal and Toy Story Mania are two of the world's most popular attractions and they are both fun-house type rides. So while I agree that passive rides like "World of Motion" are probably a thing of the past (and sadly, probably Spaceship Earth too - I don't think the interactive screens help enough), the future is bright for engaging, entertaining "dark rides". They are great for immersing you in another world, so I hope we see them in both Pandora and Star Wars Land.
Don't need to.Tell it to Glendale. And those of us bombarded by overbearing sound tracks and never ending quick edits.
Maybe they don't.Maybe they need two versions. Put the classic movie version in Paris or Shanghai.
someone correct me if i'm wrong but i thought that having tom step in as a sponsor meant nothing for the future of the ride? like disney can still do whatever they want with the building, turner just paid for the current plussingGMR needs to go too but they signed with Turner. At least, it should be a ride with all Disney movies.
The issue there is that thrill rides tend to be pretty short, as far as ride time goes. Future World has already had two major, looong dark rides replaced with hard and fast thrills. It makes it hard to a guest to fill a day in a park if too many attractions are over relatively quickly.IMO Epcot is the next wdw park after Disney Hollywood studios changed are finished to have the next major overhaul. Epcot should focus more on making heavy changes in future world that's more on the thrill side.....that's what Epcot has always lacked. Educational park has always been epcots MO i understand that.
Dark rides are back in fashion at 1401.
Demolition costs peanuts. Don't spread nonsense.
I'll quote myself:
You could probably demo Lights, Motors, Action, Indy, and Catastrophe Canyon for $10M combined. Probably less.
I'm not sure how "dark rides" is even defined these days. We're not talking "Mr Toad's Wild Ride" any longer. Spiderman at Universal and Toy Story Mania are two of the world's most popular attractions and they are both fun-house type rides. So while I agree that passive rides like "World of Motion" are probably a thing of the past (and sadly, probably Spaceship Earth too - I don't think the interactive screens help enough), the future is bright for engaging, entertaining "dark rides". They are great for immersing you in another world, so I hope we see them in both Pandora and Star Wars Land.
Nothing substantially large will be "bulldozed"Your talking about stages and arenas. It's much more expensive to bulldoze/rework large buildings and sound stages. Especially with the park open to guests while this is going on.
Guest satisfaction. Followed by Gran Fiesta. Was a pleasant surprise apparently.This may be the most beautiful sentence I've read all day.
In what way was Nemo the catalyst?
Nothing substantially large will be "bulldozed"
On the contrary, sound stages are very easy to rework.
I think what they mean is dark rides where characters are represented more by animatronics than screens. I don't even know what the point of making Ratatouille a trackless ride was: you're stuck in front of a screen the whole time, they could've saved money by making it a simulator.
Less than it already is?Guest satisfaction. Followed by Gran Fiesta. Was a pleasant surprise apparently.
Aerials Undersea could have been far less lavish on paper.
Photo Dave according to screamscape DHS is only going to add 2 Star Wars attractions so the hope for a Star Wars land is not very likely. Lance Hart knows his stuff.
Canyon can easily come down.No..... that means catastrophe canyon is sticking around, that seems to apply that IJESS is sticking around to after this ... God damn it
Oh absolutely.Less than it already is?
Canyon can easily come down.
Not to mention it's nowhere near onstage guest areas.
The ticket booths.So is there anything in DHS which would be hard to tear down?
I'm no expert but I dare say the Hollywood Tower would not be easy. LMA could be a pig with all the reinforced concrete. Aside from that the park for the main seems to be built traditionally. Albeit hurricane proof.So is there anything in DHS which would be hard to tear down?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.