DHS CARS LAND

Timothy_Q

Well-Known Member
I see a lot of people here saying that Disney would probably only bring RSR.
Why would they do that? Aren't the shops and restaurants what bring in the money? Especially since it's Cars we're talking about. A LOT of merchandise. and isn't the town itself a lot cheaper to build than RSR + rockwork?
 

doctornick

Well-Known Member
I have no clue but based on the name of the park, it doesn't sound like Cars Land would fit the park.

How does Carsland fit into a park named after California?

Anyhow, DHS is a park about movies and entertainment. RSR is a ride based on a movie. It fits as well as anything else in the park and if it helps to solidify "Pixar Place" as uniform land, that's a good thing.
 

danlb_2000

Premium Member
From what I have been able to disect from reading this thread, it sounds to me like it won't include all of Carsland, just RSR and maybe some food services.

In the Back left corner of DHS there is "Pixar Place" I put that in quotes because there is only one ride there, so I don't really consider it a land yet. RSR will fit with this theme. DHS does have an identity crisis, but I think making Pixar Place an officialy land with RSR, maybe a monster's inc coaster, and the official removal of the backlot, will help mold Pixar as the contributor to the back left corner of the studios.

Hollywood Boulevard, Sunset Boulevard in the front, Lucas themed area with Indy and Star Tours, The Animation Courtyard with TLM show and Magic of Disney Animation tour, Muppets in its own area, and now an official Pixar Place.

It might not be perfect, but it is definitely a step in the right direction!

The OP who started this thread said early on that it wasn't clear if this mean just RSR or all of Cars land so I think that is really up in the air at this point.
 

spacemt354

Chili's
Exactly, though I feel slightly different. If Californians want to see the future Avatar Land, they need to save and hop on a plane. Same for Floridians who want to see Cars Land. The whole "can't go to the other coast" excuse just doesn't make sense to me. In that case, Epcot, DAK, and DHS should be built in California and DCA should be built in Florida, since everyone "can't travel" and deserve to see everything offered on both coasts.

Well I guess we just have a difference of opinion. And that's fine

From my view, components (or at least similar concepts) of all four parks in wdw are available in DL. Soarin', Turtle Talk with Crush in Epcot. Tough to be a Bug, Grizzley River Rapids (Kali River Rapids), Goofy's Sky School (Primeaval Whril), Matterhorn (Everest) in AK. Star Tours, Toy Story Midway Mania, ToT, Fantasmic in DHS.

While I'm not defending the fact going to Turtle Talk is the same as seeing the Spaceship Earth geosphere, a lot of attractions are on both coasts, for a purpose that I feel is centered around the concept of giving both coasts a chance to experience these attractions.
 

Californian Elitist

Well-Known Member
Well I guess we just have a difference of opinion. And that's fine

From my view, components (or at least similar concepts) of all four parks in wdw are available in DL. Soarin', Turtle Talk with Crush in Epcot. Tough to be a Bug, Grizzley River Rapids (Kali River Rapids), Goofy's Sky School (Primeaval Whril), Matterhorn (Everest) in AK. Star Tours, Toy Story Midway Mania, ToT, Fantasmic in DHS.

While I'm not defending the fact going to Turtle Talk is the same as seeing the Spaceship Earth geosphere, a lot of attractions are on both coasts, for a purpose that I feel is centered around the concept of giving both coasts a chance to experience these attractions.

Yes, we can agree to disagree. Nothing wrong with that at all.
 

rioriz

Well-Known Member
Payback? What do you mean by payback? A few rides is not the same as an ENTIRE LAND. That we JUST got by the way. We just got Cars Land and now TDO wants to piggyback off of TDA's ideas and DCA's success. They need to come up with some new, original ideas.

Sorry as of now none has confirmed AN ENTIRE LAND! And by the use of "we" does that mean you are from Cali...so i could infer there is some emotional bias. Any ways as of recent (not counting clones built at the sametime)ToT, ITTBAB, Millionaire, Crush, Muppets, came to help DCA get off the ground. Buzz went to DL. Now, of recent (20 years) I can only think of Soarin that was directly lifted from DLR to WDW. So while payback may have been the wrong choice of word, there has been more lifting unique attractions from WDW in recent years than vice versa
 

MUTZIE77

Well-Known Member
No offense but I hear all this clamoring about clones and we forget when DCA needed help and DL too, many WDW rides were sent there. This is nearly payback...other than RSR I cannot think of one ride or attraction in recent years that went from DL to WDW (other than simultaneously planned ones like TSM and LM).

Plus we will be getting whatever comes from Avatar Land (while may not be exciting to some) that will be unique to WDW for now.

More than half of WDW's new attractions in the last twenty years were built at DLR or another park first
 

unkadug

Follower of "Saget"The Cult
Payback? What do you mean by payback? A few rides is not the same as an ENTIRE LAND. That we JUST got by the way. We just got Cars Land and now TDO wants to piggyback off of TDA's ideas and DCA's success. They need to come up with some new, original ideas.
Neither TDA nor TDO designs these attractions. They are done by Corporate. Believe me, TDO would have never approved the FLE had it not been for Corporate saying they had to. The same can be said about CarsLand. It was a Corporate decision. TDA had no say in the matter.

Corporate makes these decisions for the respective parks for the greater good. The local park authorities are only there to run the park for Corporate...not make decisions as large as these.
 

KevinYee

Well-Known Member
I know I'm waaaaay out on a limb with this opinion, but as awesome as the mountain range is, the core of the ride takes place indoors. If they did a mostly-indoors version of the ride in DHS, that would be OK with me, even without the mountain range.

Would it be as AWESOME as DCA's version? Heck no.
Would it satisfy the masses? Um, yes. "They're tourists. What do THEY know?"

Personally, I'd be unsatisfied. But I do travel to CA every year or two, so my soul wouldn't rend or anything.
 

doctornick

Well-Known Member
Radiator Springs is a fictional place set in Route 66, which is in California. Not to mention the huge car culture and car craze that went on in California, and still does.

Rt 66 travels through half the country and while it's not explicit where exactly the town is located, it's indicated that it's not in California (e.g. it's stated that Lightning needs to go "to California" for the race which you wouldn't say if they were already in the state). And using California's car culture as a rationale for Carslands seem like a pretty backdoor post facto justification.

Rephrased: "Cars being a movie" as justification for the ride being in DHS is just as reasonable as anything that would justify it being in DCA.

Incidentally, are there mermaids in California? Monsters who collect screams for energy? Did Goofy give flying lessons there? There's always attractions that are stretching themes to get them to fit it; it's not a big deal.
 

DisneyFan 2000

Well-Known Member
I can understand that sentiment, the only reason I disagree is because of the crown jewel called Tokyo DisneySea, which any Disney fan owes it to themselves to see at least once in their lifetime...its that good.
Nothing to add. It was just important for me to let more people see this.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom