No... Disney has enough problems without adding a 5th gate.I've got the perfect solution then... A PIXAR FIFTH GATE!
I've got the perfect solution then... A PIXAR FIFTH GATE!
No! Even if you were to forget that they seem to have all they can do with somewhat keeping up with 4 gates. Besides...an entire park designated to Pixar would be way to much of a good thing. It would all grow old very quickly.I've got the perfect solution then... A PIXAR FIFTH GATE!
Actually, it looks like this area is enough for representation for every single Pixar franchise, as I've poorly photoshopped here:
Unfortunately, it looks like there may be buildings and roads in the way...
I appreciate the humor. It seems it was lost on everyone else here...Actually, it looks like this area is enough for representation for every single Pixar franchise, as I've poorly photoshopped here:
Unfortunately, it looks like there may be buildings and roads in the way...
It would, perhaps, get old very quickly, for ADULTS.No! Even if you were to forget that they seem to have all they can do with somewhat keeping up with 4 gates. Besides...an entire park designated to Pixar would be way to much of a good thing. It would all grow old very quickly.
The "Pixarland" already exists, but only has Toy Story Midway Mania! and really needs expanding.I've seen these ideas tossed around more than once in this thread, and I've got to ask. What is this fascination with having a "Pixarland" or a "Lucasland" in DHS? The Pixar films have no relation to one another, with the exception of sequels of course. Each franchise exists in its own universe. The only thing they have in common is that they were all made by the same studio, but that's no reason to force all attractions based on Pixar IP into a single area in the movie park. The same goes for Lucas' franchises. Attractions based on Disney, Pixar, Lucasfilm, and Marvel IP can all peacefully coexist in other lands throughout WDW where it is thematically appropriate. For instance, I would love it if Fantasyland got a Brave themed attraction (although Fantasyland is likely done expanding for the time being).
I've seen these ideas tossed around more than once in this thread, and I've got to ask. What is this fascination with having a "Pixarland" or a "Lucasland" in DHS? The Pixar films have no relation to one another, with the exception of sequels of course. Each franchise exists in its own universe. The only thing they have in common is that they were all made by the same studio, but that's no reason to force all attractions based on Pixar IP into a single area in the movie park. The same goes for Lucas' franchises. Attractions based on Disney, Pixar, Lucasfilm, and Marvel IP can all peacefully coexist in other lands throughout WDW where it is thematically appropriate. For instance, I would love it if Fantasyland got a Brave themed attraction (although Fantasyland is likely done expanding for the time being).
There was never a fourth Indiana jones movie....I think the idea for "Pixarland" Was started when Disney put up this huge sign.
You would think more Pixar themed stuff would end up here.
As for Merida I agree that she belongs in FL or the UK Pavilion.
The idea of putting Carland in DHS is also weird to me since you have Pixar Studios with just TSMM and then what? Go around the corner and there is the whole town of Radiator Springs? Also all the Carsland rides are out in the open. Is this smart for WDW weather wise? I feel they could put some other indoor rides the same way they did with TSMM. Are you telling me if 20 feet away was a similar Monster's Inc ride entrance it would be weird? It would basically look like Original FL or TL. It's already got the "Studio" conceit so why not use it. This is the one park where they can get away with it.
The idea of Lucasland is crazy to me. You pick a franchise AKA Star Wars and you build off of what they already have started over at ST. As for Indy the show is still popular - update it! A new movie did come out, it had stunts use some!
There was never a fourth Indiana jones movie....
I think he's implying that the movie was so bad it doesn't exist to him.They released Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull in 2008.
That was exactly what I was sayingI think he's implying that the movie was so bad it doesn't exist to him.
I dragged my hugely pregnant butt to see that movie and was so sad. I was so/so with the movie until the Tarzan Monkey scene after that I gave up.That was exactly what I was saying
you already posted that photo and we all acknowledged it is pixar overkill, changing the background of the aerial view doesn't make a difference lol.Edited version accounting for backstage buildings:
I've seen these ideas tossed around more than once in this thread, and I've got to ask. What is this fascination with having a "Pixarland" or a "Lucasland" in DHS? The Pixar films have no relation to one another, with the exception of sequels of course. Each franchise exists in its own universe. The only thing they have in common is that they were all made by the same studio, but that's no reason to force all attractions based on Pixar IP into a single area in the movie park. The same goes for Lucas' franchises. Attractions based on Disney, Pixar, Lucasfilm, and Marvel IP can all peacefully coexist in other lands throughout WDW where it is thematically appropriate. For instance, I would love it if Fantasyland got a Brave themed attraction (although Fantasyland is likely done expanding for the time being).
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.