MarkTwain
Well-Known Member
I think that a lot more DLR regulars travel to WDW than WDW regulars travel to DLR. So it makes more sense to clone DLR's popular attractions in WDW than the other way around. Most WDW regulars don't see the value in the added travel expense for 2 less parks and no water parks. Where as a lot of DLR regulars are rabid "Disney" fans that want it all so they will pony up the bucks to make it out to the swamp.
This is a fair point and I agree to an extent. But part of this phenomenon, as you pointed out, is because DLR fans see a higher perceived value in making the cross-country flight to WDW - we have 2 parks of extra content that they don't have. But in my opinion, I think this is exactly why the DCA revamp was so important - in increasing the DLR's own individual value, so that people in the center of the USA or even on the east coast would see value in visiting both resorts. As it is, many WDW fans (and you know they exist) look at DLR and see "smaller Magic Kingdom and DHS knock-off". If all of the attractions originally designed for DCA stayed at DCA - Soarin', Midway Mania, the Little Mermaid, and all of Cars Land, in addition to the offerings that haven't been cloned [yet], like World of Color, the Aladdin stage show, and Grizzly River Run - I think you would see a LOT more people in the east coast making the trip to what they see as an increasingly unique park with offerings that can't be found elsewhere. Certainly enough people to make a difference to the DLR's bottom line.
Again, in my opinion, Disney is shooting themselves in the foot by bringing Cars Land to Orlando. What is WDW's minor gain will be DLR's major loss.