PlutoInOrlando
Active Member
- In the Parks
- Yes
More from the article about Tourist dies on Disney Everest Roller Coaster
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/busin...,2955186.story
"Reeb's death is not the first associated with an apparent heart attack at a Disney theme-park location lacking a defibrillator since the company began its program. In 2005, a 4-year-old boy with an undetected heart disease died of a heart attack after riding the Mission: Space ride at Epcot. The family sued, and one of the allegations was that Disney had not placed a defibrillator near enough to that ride. Disney and the family eventually settled the lawsuit for undisclosed terms."
**sliding every so slightly on dishwasher soap box**
And I'm just going to throw this out there...
Not to bring back a sore subject around here - BUT :hammer:- One has to ask themself - Can anyone sue anyone in a public or private place for not having a defibrillator "near by"? Would this family still have sued Disney for using the defib on the boy and he still passed away (I know a very very out there question - but still).
I mean - if this same boy (or any person/family for that matter) had passed away in the family car - would they have sued the car maker for not placing one in the car - or would they have sued the member of the family driving for not having one installed?
What would have happened if this same incident happend 10-15 years earlier. Would we/they/the family have just "chalked" it up to - "such a tragic event" and leave it at that? Or would more blame have been place on the parents for not making sure their child was "healthy" enough to ride an attraction like M:S
I guess my question goes back to the whole - has America gotten so lawsuit crazy, that you can't do anything "out of the norm" without being sued? I mean - I don't go to Disney and expect them to be able to perform open heart surgery on me should I have a heart attack. I certainly don't expect them to be able, nor in the business, of saving lives. It's a theme park for the love of all things with color!
I know I know I know...everything that is available should be made available to help those that need help in situations like this - but where do we/you draw the line in putting some reasponsiblity in the person/family that rode any of the attractions across the globe (unknowingly or knowingly about their health status) and has passed away?
And my thoughts are definitly with this family and any family that has an event such as this happen so close to Christmas.
**sliding back off dishwasher soap box**
returning radio dial to favorite holiday music station...
"Jingle Bells:xmas:, Jingle Bells:xmas:, Jingle all the way - (sing along now!) Oh what fun it is to ride - a one horse open sleigh - HEY!"
"We need a Disney Christmas - right this very minute..."
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/busin...,2955186.story
"Reeb's death is not the first associated with an apparent heart attack at a Disney theme-park location lacking a defibrillator since the company began its program. In 2005, a 4-year-old boy with an undetected heart disease died of a heart attack after riding the Mission: Space ride at Epcot. The family sued, and one of the allegations was that Disney had not placed a defibrillator near enough to that ride. Disney and the family eventually settled the lawsuit for undisclosed terms."
**sliding every so slightly on dishwasher soap box**
And I'm just going to throw this out there...
Not to bring back a sore subject around here - BUT :hammer:- One has to ask themself - Can anyone sue anyone in a public or private place for not having a defibrillator "near by"? Would this family still have sued Disney for using the defib on the boy and he still passed away (I know a very very out there question - but still).
I mean - if this same boy (or any person/family for that matter) had passed away in the family car - would they have sued the car maker for not placing one in the car - or would they have sued the member of the family driving for not having one installed?
What would have happened if this same incident happend 10-15 years earlier. Would we/they/the family have just "chalked" it up to - "such a tragic event" and leave it at that? Or would more blame have been place on the parents for not making sure their child was "healthy" enough to ride an attraction like M:S
I guess my question goes back to the whole - has America gotten so lawsuit crazy, that you can't do anything "out of the norm" without being sued? I mean - I don't go to Disney and expect them to be able to perform open heart surgery on me should I have a heart attack. I certainly don't expect them to be able, nor in the business, of saving lives. It's a theme park for the love of all things with color!
I know I know I know...everything that is available should be made available to help those that need help in situations like this - but where do we/you draw the line in putting some reasponsiblity in the person/family that rode any of the attractions across the globe (unknowingly or knowingly about their health status) and has passed away?
And my thoughts are definitly with this family and any family that has an event such as this happen so close to Christmas.
**sliding back off dishwasher soap box**
returning radio dial to favorite holiday music station...
"Jingle Bells:xmas:, Jingle Bells:xmas:, Jingle all the way - (sing along now!) Oh what fun it is to ride - a one horse open sleigh - HEY!"
"We need a Disney Christmas - right this very minute..."