If true, I'm kind of agnostic about this at the moment. If there is only a finite amount of money to be spent, and it's only enough for one big project, it's easy to see benefits for each option. On one hand, the MK is by far the stalest of the five Kingdoms. On the other hand, the Studios is a disaster and will suffer the most from the IOA expansion. I guess I fall in favor of bringing the MK up to code, as it will require a lot less than the Studios needs (which, IMO, is complete demolishment of everything beyond Hollywood Blvd).
Nothing shocks me anymore. After the Adventurers Club closed, I was made immune to "shocking" news.
I don't know... I thought my ability to be shocked wore off ages ago but they still keep coming up with ways to get me...
Dozens of shows the whole family can enjoy
Dozens?!
several more D and C Tickets
Several?!
Studios is ONLY lacking to people who don't go the park, but talk bad about it to look like they have serious opinions on things and enjoy acting like they have a wealth of Disney Knowledge and (furthermore) deserve it. Anyone who goes down to Studios these days can see the park's doing just fine. In upkeep, attendance, and guest satisfaction. It's a myth, a Disney Urban Legend, that Circa 2009, Studios is a "lacking park".
Well, I guess I'm one of those wannabe intellectuals, and unless things have changed considerably since March I think that the park is far from fine. It is stale. It's also "lacking'". It's lacking a consistency of theme, quality, and attractions. It's never overcome the split identity of its original design; while the production side no longer is used for filming, it still keeps a layout and design that was never intended to be a guest area.
"Sounds Dangerous", Star Tours, the "backlot" tour... they're all embarrassments at this point. The GMR is ill maintained. The Animation Tour is a pathetic and nigh-pointless remnant of its former self - and the huge animation building goes unused. Idol will go stale as sure as Millionaire did. I also have a feeling that Toy Story's lines are due to its newness (and lack of anything else to do to in the park). How long has the BATB show been playing?
It's a mess. The general public might not care about any of this, but they sure as heck will take notice when the Wizarding World ads start showing up on TV. Studios is already the least-attended Disney park in Orlando; if guests spend a day less at WDW why would they suddenly decide to take it out on the other parks? MK and EC will be fine, and I think that DAK tends to appeal strongest to a different demographic than the other three. That leaves Studio holding the bag.
Let's toss aside all of the above as irrelevant to most "once in a lifetime visitors" (irrelevant in that they wouldn't know any of this one way or the other). I think they will likely not go to DHS (if they are skipping any one park) because of the word "Studios" in the title, and they will have "already seen Universal Studios, why go to another Studio?"
Also true.
No one said it was dead. But the park is being ruined with poor decisions. The park closes at 7 p.m. three nights a week during the summer. How stupid is that?
Of course, a full day schedule requires a full day of attractions, which the park just doesn't have.
And if someone's option is either see an Idol show and ride RnRC or try something completely new and with an amazing state-of-the-art centerpiece attraction, people are gonna head to Uni.
+1
I think comparing Uni and IoA together to DHS is irrelevent because they both kick DHS' ______ with rides single handedly. DHS theme is better, but really that can't top the actual rides! IoA has great theme and rides, a very SOLID park (OT: I'm speding my next day on vacationin both IoA and Uni so I'll try to get updates on RRR and WWoHP or some cool photos!).
Agreed - IOA waxes DHS every which way. I think the unforseen outcome of Wizarding World could be that lots and lots of people who have never even heard about IOA (see the botched '99 ad campaign) discover how impressive it is. It's a possibility...
That "Sea Monster" is Gertie the Dinosaur one of the most important contributions to animation history and it just so happens that backdrops are part of HOLLYWOOD sets from HOLLYWOOD movies.
Absolutely. It's a great nod to animation's past (also fitting the time period the park is supposed to represent), and also a nice inclusion of some "California Crazy" architecture. Would we *really* feel better if it was a giant Disney character??
To quote Walt Disney "People are OK". The Disney parks don't have to have Disney-branded stuff shoved in your face every 5 feet. Many people don't remember that the first couple years of Disneylands existence 'characters were not allowed in the park at all.
+1
Many people don't remember because they really don't care about Disneyland's past regulations, and many people don't know that sea dragon Gertie is! Gertie is like an inside joke where only a dozen or so people get in the park on one day. I say give it the boot and put in a familiar face. I fell in love with Disney through the movies and characters in those movies, which led to me going to the parks. I mind EVERYTHING being Disney related, don't get me wrong, but some things just need to change. "Many people don't remember that the first couple years of Disneylands existence 'characters were not allowed in the park at all." ... no wonder that got changed....
Yeah, they should put in something familiar, something Disney... hey, why not a giant sorcerer's hat? Like in Fantasia? That would be AWESOME!
You still don't get what I'm trying to say? No one else knows. Now I may now, but millions don't. Get it?
:hammer:
Should we start taking surveys? What's an acceptable percentage of guests that must understand a reference before they can put it in the park? Bet most people wouldn't get the Main Street windows at the MK... heck, most of Hollywood Boulevard is composed of references and nods to things that most people might not be familiar with.
So? That's like ripping Frontierland apart because "DERP Nobody cares about the old west anymore" or taking out Splash Mountain because it's themed to a movie Disney refuses to put out on DVD.
Trying to appeal only to the lowest common denominator is why the media sucks so much. Why America is looked down on by other countries as a land of stupid people.
+1,000,000.