Brazil and Australia needs to go where Dino Land and Chester and Hester is
As offensive as Dino Land is, we need more to do - not less. This culture of slow replacement and not adding new experiences has got to stop.
Just because a McDonalds can be built in 9 weeks in the real world....
1. The simulator similar to Soarin' where you ride a banshee"will feature at least two major attractions"
Is he sure about that?
Nothing new or really interesting in that article. A rehash of much of what has been said on the forums for years. He also misses some of the other significant changes coming to DAK.
I guess it depends on your definition of major. I class it as being an E+.1. The simulator similar to Soarin' where you ride a banshee
2. The boat ride through the bioluminescent forest with AA's and special effects
Thats 2 right there
Speaking of flying ride, I wonder how they're going to make riding the banshee convincing.
I guess it depends on your definition of major. I class it as being an E+.
The problem with Disney and the word 'major' is they use it in relative terms ...
They probably consider Under the Sea and the 7DMR as "major"...
My kids have pointed out a Lion King Virtual Safari narrated by Timon and Pumba.
This would make an awesome addition to the park.
As BGT has updated animal areas like the Cheetah enclosure and Jungala they are better than anything comparable to DAK. Jungala is one of the best tiger habitats I have ever seen and I'm still amazed how active the tigers still are.
The men who sailed wooden ships were called iron men because of the sheer guts it took to sail a tall shipIron Men? Like more than one of them? Is there something I missed when I saw the first Iron Man?
At least that is what this fairly well-informed dude thinks:
http://www.dailyfinance.com/2014/01/17/disney-animal-kingdom-avatar-theme-park-analysis/
My thoughts to come next month but thought you may find this a good read as I head off to the land of real castles!
(seriously, who drinks that much?!?!)
I'm curious how many people read this article and saw how lacking it was. Or how many just pushed "Like" because they have "Spirit dust" in their eyes?
To me the article is more about the lack of attractions at DAKThe article is complete garbage. The bigger point is probably that a somewhat main stream, unbiased, financial media source is questioning the financial impact of AvatarLand.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.