Californian Elitist
Well-Known Member
Okay. That’s fair.It was sung well. Obviously it's the way she wants to sing it, so that's her prerogative.
Do I like it? Not sure yet, need to hear the entire song.
Okay. That’s fair.It was sung well. Obviously it's the way she wants to sing it, so that's her prerogative.
Do I like it? Not sure yet, need to hear the entire song.
There’s no “fight”…Challenge accepted.
The remakes are creatively bankrupt…if chapek wishes to “stand on his own”…a good first move would be to pivot away from them.Which begs the question, what is the point of this new movie?
…the design is the “magic” and always has been (if you can interpret that nonsense term close to reality)Wish they would do more Disney Parks shows on Disney+
I don't know, he's cute, well-designed, and endearing in terms of a sense of positivity and childlike wonder, at least in his original incarnation. I think the context of the character goes beyond the ride to include Epcot which enhances Figment's appeal as a character the conjures up associations with a place people enjoy.
I can't remember if Dreamfinder was also featured in those short educational films Disney made using Figment in the 1980s, but either way I think he still worked as a somewhat naive character excited to learn new things without having Dreamfinder next to him. He's mostly a happy and curious kid in the form of a little purple dragon wearing a fetching sweater, but I'm not sure that gives Figment any less depth of character compared to most of the Fab Five.
The remakes are creatively bankrupt…if chapek wishes to “stand on his own”…a good first move would be to pivot away from them.
This all “started” with malificent…which was ingenious…
These things are not. They’re cynical.
I think figment as a sidekick to a classic “crazy inventor” type character works…That still screams "sidekick" to me. It doesn't necessarily have to be Dreamfinder, but I think Figment on his own doesn't work -- it's partially why his appearance in the current Imagination ride is so bad.
I see what you mean, and even the wide-eyed child aspect of his character works better with some sort of guide through whatever he's experiencing or learning about.That still screams "sidekick" to me. It doesn't necessarily have to be Dreamfinder, but I think Figment on his own doesn't work -- it's partially why his appearance in the current Imagination ride is so bad.
If it was a one off…. . . To be a new take on the classic story
I haven’t seen hell. I’ve seen nothing but positive comments, besides from a few folks here.I think when you set out to overturn “classic tropes”…you eventually become a new trope…
And with social media and digital access…you’re going to catch all kinds of hell quickly.
Oh…it will come…as you well know. The vocal complainers over take all the positive juju…I haven’t seen hell. I’ve seen nothing but positive comments, besides from a few folks here.
I'd bet money that it's throughout the whole song.
Thankfully singers of all sorts exists, and ones who riff have found great success.
When she riffed the end of Part of Your World, I was gooped, gagged, and slayed. I screamed yasss queen and snapped my fingers.
She sounds incredible.
Halle’s voice is angelic and from what I’ve heard so far, her rendition of “Part of Your World” sounds fantastic. The run/riff was the best part.
People complain about Disney remaking the animated films and lacking originality (something I agree with), but then turn around and also complain when a singer puts their own spin on a song.
I'm trying to decide whether I'm interested in this one. I'll be honest and say that I've only seen the Beauty & the Beast and (godawful) Dumbo remakes because they really don't appeal to me. But, they are a license to print money and seem to be instantly forgotten in favour of the original versions so I understand why they make them and don't really care as I don't have to see them.For the record, I want to see Little Mermaid and I hope it's great. It's my favorite of the "princess" movies.
The actress reminds me of Ariel and has a very cute, wide-eyed, innocent face that reminds me of original, so I like her casting.
I actually like dumbo…but I’m an Eva green fan…I'm trying to decide whether I'm interested in this one. I'll be honest and say that I've only seen the Beauty & the Beast and (godawful) Dumbo remakes because they really don't appeal to me. But, they are a license to print money and seem to be instantly forgotten in favour of the original versions so I understand why they make them and don't really care as I don't have to see them.
The lead actress in this version looks good in the role to me, though, and is at least a singer. The casting of non-singers in Beauty & the Beast was one of the things that really grated on me about that film compared to the pure talent on the original soundtrack. Also interested to see what Alan Menken and Lin Manuel Miranda come up with. So, this is probably the first remake in a while I am kind of interested to see!
Very good advice. I used to automatically dismiss…but I learned. Save praise or criticism until you SEE it.
That’s not the same as judging the decisions to make these things and how they go about it. That’s a business analysis and longterm goals of the Disney company
Sorry to hear about Pinocchio… I had hopes
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.