ppete1975
Well-Known Member
1) who doesnt think a physical wwe hall of fame with all of the props and history wouldnt do well (disney springs anyone)Because the MCU DID begin in 2008, and Disney didn't buy Marvel until 2009?
Electra is one of the worst movies of all time. Catwoman isn't much better. Wonder Woman I'll give you, but I don't think they're inducting Gal Gadot as a Disney Legend for her performance in a DC movie.
Blade is a comic book movie, but he's not really a 'superhero'.
As far as the 'deserving of a Disney Legend' stupid *** argument goes:
1) If you think this is bad, look at who's in the WWE Hall of Fame.
2) Its not like there are actual qualifications or requirements.
3) Look at some of the people getting into sports HoFs now. Tim Raines? Please.
4) They have to induct some people each D23. Which means the pool must get shallower/deeper (depending on how you look at it).
5) They just added 'Diversity' to the Keys so of course they are going to add more diverse Legends to go along with it.
6) There's no physical location to go to view busts or plaques or anything.
7) It means literally nothing. It doesn't hurt anyone. Its just an empty honor for publicity and some ego stroking.
There should be more people in. They should be inducting 'famous' long time CMs like Maynard from DL.
3) what i dont get is life time bans... shoeless joe jackson is dead .. put him in... when pete rose dies he should be in too
6)