G00fyDad
Well-Known Member
The only theme of this merchandise shop is… merchandise.
I am okay with that. I don't want to shop in Arendelle or something that looks as dark and confusing as the inside of a nickelodeon box.
The only theme of this merchandise shop is… merchandise.
Unfortunately, until people start realizing they're getting a watered down experience, nothing will change. Same goes for the parks but that is a whole other conversation happening in 90% of the threads hereNo, buddy. I'm on the same page as you. If I can get the same generic stuff anywhere on property, why would I go here? But, they know their market. Sadly, I don't think they include us in "their demographic".
Unfortunately, until people start realizing they're getting a watered down experience, nothing will change. Same goes for the parks but that is a whole other conversation happening in 90% of the threads here
I'll try to be consistent with my other posts, and I will wait to judge Creations until I have seen it, hopefully in August. So I don't want to say there anything wrong with it, because its not finished. WoD on the other hand, I think I have voiced my opinion thereSo what would you like to see the Creations shop look like?
I'll try to be consistent with my other posts, and I will wait to judge Creations until I have seen it, hopefully in August. So I don't want to say there anything wrong with it, because its not finished. WoD on the other hand, I think I have voiced my opinion there
What I'd like to see is a modern look from a color perspective, and that doesn't mean whites and grays. Nice colors, pastels, that are clean looking but still vibrant. I'd want to see playful details, (i.e. dreamfinder's ship with figment, animations with World Showcase portrayed, etc.) as a node to the past but not recreating the 1980's ad 1990's. Ideally as I have said above, a balance between being functional, modern but differentiated from any other store you can find in a strip mall. Short of me drawing this out, this is what my hope would be at a high level.
To each their own for sure, and whether I like it or not, that is the direction Disney seems to be going, and I am getting older, so naturally I think everything in the past was betterFair point.
I just don't want all of the "over-the-top" sensory overload stuff. After a little while it gets to be a bit much walking through those places. I love the WoD redesign but my wife would rather they kept it the way it was.
They're being themed differently, not de-themed. I honestly think the removal of carpet, which is one of the changes you seem to agree with, is one of the few things that actually is intended to save on costs. The new floors will likely be more durable, and they will probably be much easier for staff to clean. Everything else is generally of the same material quality as before (aside from the WL beds, IMO), and they've even added architectural details like the coved patio doorways for the Contemporary that were probably a fairly expensive add, extrapolated across the entire resort. Creating custom fabrics and wallpapers is also almost certainly more expensive than buying a generic tropical drapery or an off-the-rack throw pillow. The re-themes are simply not to your taste, nor are they to many people's taste if we were to take this board as a representative sample, but that has very little to do with the cost of the remodel.We can only speculate why Disney does anything. The "de-theming" of the resort rooms and retail locations is probably is a cost saving effort; both a cost saving for the initial install and a cost saving for the ongoing maintenance for both the rooms and retail locations.
Some say the new sparsely themed rooms feel brighter, cleaner, and calming after a day at the parks. To Disney, I think its a cost saving move, again in the initial install and ongoing maintenance. I will say there should be NO CARPET in any of the WDW resorts because it's a matter of when the carpets will get mildew, not if.
As for the de theming of retail, again it's a cost saving and in (may) make the merch stand out more due to the lack of theme in the retail displays.
Having said that, I HOPE the Main Street Confectionary and the Chapeau keeps the beautiful theming when it comes out of refurb.
They're being themed differently, not de-themed. I honestly think the removal of carpet, which is one of the changes you seem to agree with, is one of the few things that actually is intended to save on costs. The new floors will likely be more durable, and they will probably be much easier for staff to clean. Everything else is generally of the same material quality as before (aside from the WL beds, IMO), and they've even added architectural details like the coved patio doorways for the Contemporary that were probably a fairly expensive add, extrapolated across the entire resort. Creating custom fabrics and wallpapers is also almost certainly more expensive than buying a generic tropical drapery or an off-the-rack throw pillow. The re-themes are simply not to your taste, nor are they to many people's taste if we were to take this board as a representative sample, but that has very little to do with the cost of the remodel.
For retail, I'm not entirely sure where they're going with it yet, and I think the Confectionery and Chapeau will indeed reveal a lot when they re-open about whether or not what they've done at EPCOT is specifically due to them moving to a cleaner, modern aesthetic as part of that park's renewal or if it's more about a global strategy of not allowing themed environments to outshine the merchandise. I hope it's the former, and the fact that they've left most of the World Showcase stores alone supports that, I think.
I kind of feel the opposite. None of what they're doing in EPCOT is cheap by any stretch of the imagination. Demolishing CommuniCore west, building Cosmic Rewind, installing Harmonious ... These are all vastly more expensive ventures than they needed to be, reflecting a penchant for grandiose megaliths even when they come at the expense of the sense of scale and detail inherent in the rest of the park. I don't think cheap is the problem with any of the new builds or refurbishments, in EPCOT or in the resorts.I would be willing to bet a side effect of the "different but not de-theming" of the resorts and retail is cost savings. Just a hunch.
Agree there too. The last two trips was the first times I have ever not bought anything in WOD. It just isn't interesting any more.No, buddy. I'm on the same page as you. If I can get the same generic stuff anywhere on property, why would I go here? But, they know their market. Sadly, I don't think they include us in "their demographic".
I agree. People seem to jump on cost savings as the cause for changes or additions they don't like, but that seems a hold-over from the late Eisner era when there did seem a push toward budget Imagineering. These days, whether you like what they're doing or not, everything they do seems to cost a fortune. Perhaps too much.I kind of feel the opposite. None of what they're doing in EPCOT is cheap by any stretch of the imagination. Demolishing CommuniCore west, building Cosmic Rewind, installing Harmonious ... These are all vastly more expensive ventures than they needed to be, reflecting a penchant for grandiose megaliths even when they come at the expense of the sense of scale and detail inherent in the rest of the park. I don't think cheap is the problem with any of the new builds or refurbishments, in EPCOT or in the resorts.
Being cheap and costing a lot are not mutually exclusive.I agree. People seem to jump on cost savings as the cause for changes or additions they don't like, but that seems a hold-over from the late Eisner era when there did seem a push toward budget Imagineering. These days, whether you like what they're doing or not, everything they do seems to cost a fortune. Perhaps too much.
Cost savings and costing a lot is, though.Being cheap and costing a lot are not mutually exclusive.
No, they’re not. You have to save costs on some things if too much is going somewhere else. The overall budget can be obscene while line items are tight.Cost savings and costing a lot is, though.
I'm not saying they're spending money well at all. None of this is budget, though.
Fair enough. I guess the question, then, is where the money is going. If Disney as a company is not being cheap in terms of how much money is being allocated to these projects but then execution suffers because the money is being spent poorly, the latter seems to be the issue more than the former.No, they’re not. You have to save costs on some things if too much is going somewhere else. The overall budget can be obscene while line items are tight.
Whoever missed the ball of calling the front half of the park "Discovery World" should be ashamed. Those naming schemes (playing to people who don't realize that different parts of FW represent different themes) are outrageously stupid. Disney, I'm convinced has totally forgotten the concept of less=more. Discovery World would've worked perfectly without becoming too specific. Discoverys in nature, Discoverys in technology. And I've said it before, I'll say it again, if they were going to go with new names for FW, why couldn't they have called the spine area "EPCOT CENTER"? It would've been such a tribute to the original park name, been completely open to possibilities, AND it actually is the geographic CENTER of the park!I'm still calling it Future World and World Showcase, and probably will keep calling it that. World Celebration, World Discovery, and World Nature are just too cumbersome to say all the time.
That's my personal preference, at least.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.