Coronavirus and Walt Disney World general discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
and that hospitalization has declined overall in the past week in AZ or at worst stay flat
Flat isn’t the goal at least not four months later...and you missed the part where it climbed a lot just prior before...long after the “we ain’t bailing you out” rich states got their hands dirty and fought through the spring.

The heroes were at the front of the column and did the trial and error. Most will forget...but not all.
 

legwand77

Well-Known Member
Flat isn’t the goal at least not four months later...and you missed the part where it climbed a lot just prior before...long after the “we ain’t bailing you out” rich states got their hands dirty and fought through the spring.

The heroes were at the front of the column and did the trial and error. Most will forget...but not all.
Flat is what the hospitalization number is supposed to be and that is where the current numbers lie (are at)
 

legwand77

Well-Known Member
I feel like this has been said at least once per page for the past few days of this thread, but: source?

CDC gives plenty of information on deaths (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr68/nvsr68_09-508.pdf, https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/2017-2018.htm). The age groups don't nicely end at 30, but a pretty close number to 1 significant figure would be a flu mortality rate of 1 per 100,000 with age <30. With the demographics of the US, that would be 1000 flue deaths (again, 1 significant figure). Covid deaths of ages <34 are ~900.
The source was what he posted, but I will give you another, yes it <24 but that is due to the reason you stated, point still stands. This estimate was from back in May and still tracking the same.


It is looking like the number of deaths overall for 2020 including Covid deaths, will probably be very similar to previous years.
 

Attachments

  • 1*TmRhLeVqEn-yjggwYvQPUA.png
    1*TmRhLeVqEn-yjggwYvQPUA.png
    185 KB · Views: 85
Last edited:

Kevin_W

Well-Known Member
The source was what he posted, but I will give you another, yes it <24 but that is due to the reason you stated, point still stands. This estimate was from back in May and if anything looks better now.


An interesting graph. The author of the article links back to the same source of CDC data, but then jumps to his conclusion without showing any calculation. He assumes 150,000 total Covid deaths, which would lead to ~1500 deaths for <30 age rage. I don't see how you can compare that to the #'s for flu deaths (~1/100,000) and get the data he puts in the bar charts.

The infant data makes sense, since flu is relatively deadly for infants and Covid is not, but the 1-24-year-old data doesn't look right.
 

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
An interesting graph. The author of the article links back to the same source of CDC data, but then jumps to his conclusion without showing any calculation. He assumes 150,000 total Covid deaths, which would lead to ~1500 deaths for <30 age rage. I don't see how you can compare that to the #'s for flu deaths (~1/100,000) and get the data he puts in the bar charts.

The infant data makes sense, since flu is relatively deadly for infants and Covid is not, but the 1-24-year-old data doesn't look right.

whats the current death count for folks under 30 attributed to COVID?
 

danlb_2000

Premium Member
I am wondering what the next topic of panic headlines from the media will be once the focus on the new cases fades. Rest assured if history shows there will be a next topic.

Again we always should watch hospitalizations and make sure they stay steady.

 

Angelo721

Member
There is also something that is not discussed. Mental Health from the shutdown.


We all want to prevent deaths from the physical effect of Covid, but keeping things shutdown causes an increase in suicide, abuse (kids and spouses) drug and alcohol abuse. Opening the economy is not about "Riding Space Mountain" it is getting back to normal so we can all feed our families, send kids back to school, etc.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
There is also something that is not discussed. Mental Health from the shutdown.


We all want to prevent deaths from the physical effect of Covid, but keeping things shutdown causes an increase in suicide, abuse (kids and spouses) drug and alcohol abuse. Opening the economy is not about "Riding Space Mountain" it is getting back to normal so we can all feed our families, send kids back to school, etc.

Really, your source is someone who says:

Let me preface this article by saying I’m not a doctor, nor an expert on infectious diseases—I’m a writer and a small business owner—so I cannot scientifically speak to when or how governors should begin safely reopening the US economy.

??

Anyway, yes. Mental health has been brought up. By the OPEN NOW folks. Without any hard data, just like you did.

If we're just going to guess at this, then let's guess what would happen if we just kept everything open and we had several million deaths and bodies were stacked in the street.

Do you think that might have an affect on mental health?
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
I don’t know why you want to dismiss this so casually. It is a legit concern, even for folks like myself that have supported the mitigation efforts. We know it’s an issue looking at past recessions and we know calls to suicide prevention hotlines have been surging. Even if some take this type of information and go to an extreme with their rhetoric, it shouldn’t be dismissed as a concern coming from the “crazies” or however else you or others want to categorize it.

I'm not saying that we shouldn't be concerned on the mental health impact of COVID and our societal response to it.

I'm saying that arguments that mental health problems and possible suicides attributed aren't reasons to OPEN NOW and not wear masks. Because:

1. Where's the data of suicides that can be attributed to the COVID response?​
2. Do you really think that that number of suicides is going to be significant enough to warrant a change in behavior (open now, no masks) such that opening up completely without masks isn't going to be the cause of even more deaths?​
3. The alternative to the restrictive policies that were put in place to contain COVID is not to have had those restrictions at all. Which would have meant many, many more deaths and many cities' ICUs and morgues being overwhelmed. And that would also cause a mental health problem of continuous grief and anxiety, leading to just as many if not more suicides.​

But, of course, that's conjecture on my part. Just like the conjecture on the part of those who say the suicide rate has gotten so bad that the only solution is to open now. And stop wearing masks.
 

Andrew C

You know what's funny?
I'm not saying that we shouldn't be concerned on the mental health impact of COVID and our societal response to it.

I'm saying that arguments that mental health problems and possible suicides attributed aren't reasons to OPEN NOW and not wear masks. Because:

1. Where's the data of suicides that can be attributed to the COVID response?​
2. Do you really think that that number of suicides is going to be significant enough to warrant a change in behavior (open now, no masks) such that opening up completely without masks isn't going to be the cause of even more deaths?​
3. The alternative to the restrictive policies that were put in place to contain COVID is not to have had those restrictions at all. Which would have meant many, many more deaths and many cities' ICUs and morgues being overwhelmed. And that would also cause a mental health problem of continuous grief and anxiety, leading to just as many if not more suicides.​

But, of course, that's conjecture on my part. Just like the conjecture on the part of those who say the suicide rate has gotten so bad that the only solution is to open now. And stop wearing masks.

fair enough.
 

oceanbreeze77

Well-Known Member
I'm not saying that we shouldn't be concerned on the mental health impact of COVID and our societal response to it.

I'm saying that arguments that mental health problems and possible suicides attributed aren't reasons to OPEN NOW and not wear masks. Because:

1. Where's the data of suicides that can be attributed to the COVID response?​
2. Do you really think that that number of suicides is going to be significant enough to warrant a change in behavior (open now, no masks) such that opening up completely without masks isn't going to be the cause of even more deaths?​
3. The alternative to the restrictive policies that were put in place to contain COVID is not to have had those restrictions at all. Which would have meant many, many more deaths and many cities' ICUs and morgues being overwhelmed. And that would also cause a mental health problem of continuous grief and anxiety, leading to just as many if not more suicides.​

But, of course, that's conjecture on my part. Just like the conjecture on the part of those who say the suicide rate has gotten so bad that the only solution is to open now. And stop wearing masks.
I am a major proponent of the importance of mental health, and while I recognize that YES, mental health is suffering during the pandemic, one of the biggest issues I have with the reopen because of mental health claim is that the people crying out MENTAL HEALTH!MENTAL HEALTH! are the same people who want to defund mental health aide.
 

legwand77

Well-Known Member
Okay this is extremely embarrassing. What the heck does he think ICU means!?!?!?!


I found this humorous at first because of the guy who wrote the tweet (the grim reaper), but this is an shining example of what is wrong with the panic news, knee jerk reactions and then amplication of incorrect info. It is then spread across the social media landscape. Desantis, politics aside, did the right thing here in respect to proper planning strategies and getting correct data.
 

Flugell

Well-Known Member
There is also something that is not discussed. Mental Health from the shutdown.


We all want to prevent deaths from the physical effect of Covid, but keeping things shutdown causes an increase in suicide, abuse (kids and spouses) drug and alcohol abuse. Opening the economy is not about "Riding Space Mountain" it is getting back to normal so we can all feed our families, send kids back to school, etc.
I feel sure you meant to say as well as keeping the elderly and vulnerable safe. Being alive must surely be the priority.
 

Horizons '83

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
Its not picking a side if you don't talk politics at all. That is the very reason it isn't permitted in this thread. That is the last I'll speak about, it just something I wish you consider. That's all.
 

DisneyDebRob

Well-Known Member
I found this humorous at first because of the guy who wrote the tweet (the grim reaper), but this is an shining example of what is wrong with the panic news, knee jerk reactions and then amplication of incorrect info. It is then spread across the social media landscape. Desantis, politics aside, did the right thing here in respect to proper planning strategies and getting correct data.
Again I disagree with most of what you said. They are opinions so I’m entitled to disagree, not many factual statements again in your post.
Is “panic news” the new catchphrase or talking point? I e seen a lot of that word lately as the scare and fear ones take a back seat. It’s being reported and whether you believe it or not it’s exactly what he’s doing. Here’s a Florida link to who he talked with and how they are changing the reporting.


If you can tell me the incorrect info as you said, I will apologize because I can’t seem to find it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom