Yes, I mentioned before that too many Americans have unfortunately shown that if you give them an inch in this crisis, they'll take 2 or 3 inches. It's not the majority of Americans, but certainly enough of a critical mass that it ends up defeating any public health goal. That's largely why any attempt at a "halfway" approach to try allow for more individual choices has been followed up with a stricter approach with outright government orders shortly thereafter.
What makes America incredibly strong during normal times - our liberty, freedom, and independent spirit - is unfortunately what also makes us not very well-positioned to deal with times like these where a public health crisis requires a curbing or even outright prohibition of what is ingrained as fundamental in our culture. Putting aside countries like China where the government effectively has complete police power over its citizens, think of places like South Korea where they are an open society but the culture is much more inclined to actually heed public directions to health and safety on their own compared to us.
Our natural instinct in America is to defy restrictions (whether it's from the government, business or overall culture) and freedom in and of itself is deemed to be an absolute principle. In fact, that's how our country was born in the first place and, if anything, we *celebrate* defiance. That's a great thing and we should never change that. Unfortunately, that natural instinct is often at odds with what's effectively required to get this pandemic under control. So, I don't blame people for seeing that tension or even pushing back against it (as I believe that's important for society as a lawyer), but by the same token, there needs to be flexibility to understand that extraordinary times requires extraordinary measures. An inflexible belief that personal freedom always prevails regardless of the circumstances can be just as dangerous in times like these as an inflexible belief in a totalitarian state. That's why the federal and state government units have a lot more powers in a declared emergency situation like now that would otherwise go against what's stated in the Constitution - there's a practical recognition that the only way to preserve freedom in the long-term is to take certain painful actions in the short-term.