Yes and no, it depends on the question you're trying to answer.Fraud or no fraud it’s not something we will know about for years.
Was there any fraud at all anywhere in the system where even 1 or 100 or 1,000 deaths were labeled COVID by someone incorrectly because they wanted something. Sure, I'll buy that we may not know that answer for years. I would even just accept a yes right now. After all, there have been 500,000+ deaths, it's certainly possible that at least 1 of them was attributed wrong on purpose. I would even accept that it would make media reporting, it's a good story, sensational and rare, both attributes that make things news.
Was there so much fraud the entire COVID death risk is overrated and wrong? That fraud is so rampant that 10,000, 50,000, or 100,000 of the 500,000+ deaths is a lie? We know that now, there's no need to wait years. It's just not happening at a scale that would have any impact on COVID death risk reporting. Massive grift and law breaking is also a good news story.
All the posts here arguing fraud are the second. None of them are people looking at individual hospital systems trying to dig out a few hundred cases of fraud. They're all trying to say that the entire risk of COVID is lower because fraud is so rampant. We absolutely know this is incorrect now and do not need to wait years for it to surface.