Coronavirus and Walt Disney World general discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

GoofGoof

Premium Member
If the virus doesn’t improve, there won’t be an economy. And that’s why I added that for it to work, there would need to be a compensation and deliver program, not half hearted efforts. So those are affected could get the help they deserve. But if they’re not getting it now I don’t think they will ever
Exactly. Look at the rest of the world. Any place that implemented real restrictions also made sure to take care of workers and businesses as well. Somehow in this country it was decided by a lot of people that you either choose the economy or public health. If done right you can protect both...we did not do it right, not even close.
 

Jrb1979

Well-Known Member
And does that memo not say "if we reach"?
Yes it does. That memo is to say what rationing means. They are already at that point.

Wasn’t California consistently one of the states with the most restrictions?


Restrictions don't work at home. A lot of the blame is on family gatherings from Thanksgiving. It will continue probably through Christmas. IMO its going to continue to get worse before it gets better. Its all cause people have to people.
 

SamusAranX

Well-Known Member
Wasn’t California consistently one of the states with the most restrictions?

Yes, but unless you’re gonna begin arresting people having parties or gatherings of more then a couple people in their home (I.e. a legally defined limit)...I don’t know any state willing to go there (yet)
 

correcaminos

Well-Known Member
I’m glad y’all did a local lockdown. To me the issue was every state could do their own thing. That’s what I meant when I wish we had a unified lockdown. That way, maybe some would have been convinced of the necessity. So now you have Florida where it’s head in the sand, versus California who said enough is enough and did tailored lockdowns. I don’t mean to offend you, I just find it very hard to brush all with the same stroke. There are definitely selfish people in America. But I’ve met or know a lot of kind people who care about what happens to their neighbor, friends, and family. I know what you see versus what I see is probably different.

I hope that funeral home goes out of business or at least gets fined. No excuses for that anti mask behavior from them.

And yes, please get vaccinated. I’m low on the totem pole as I am lowest risk but the moment it’s available I am getting it.
They won't go out of business. Covid deniers are real and where they live, no one cares or will turn them in. It's infuriating. The areas here that were benefiting most from lock downs of various levels just don't care.
Were you allowed to freely come and go? Go to the store or to pick up take out? Visit a neighbor or friend? You weren't locked down. None of us in the US were
Did I say full lock down? No. Were things shut down on us. Heck yeah.

Essentials were open. That was it. Only take out. Only essential stores. Many businesses were closed. Schools were mandated to be closed as were day cares. Even city playgrounds were closed. My mostly outdoor zoo was mandated closed as were amusement parks. So no, I could not do what I wanted. It was much harsher than any mandate or even stay at home order ever was.
 

Chi84

Premium Member
Yes it does. That memo is to say what rationing means. They are already at that point.



Restrictions don't work at home. A lot of the blame is on family gatherings from Thanksgiving. It will continue probably through Christmas. IMO its going to continue to get worse before it gets better. Its all cause people have to people.
I don’t know if it’s that simple. In Illinois our governor predicted a surge after Thanksgiving gatherings, but the surge never happened. Instead, the positivity rate has been declining steadily since November 10.

It’s hard for me to believe Illinoisans were better than the citizens of other states in limiting Thanksgiving gatherings. In fact, one poster who lives in a small town said the people there refuse to wear masks or social distance because they hate the governor!
 

Jrb1979

Well-Known Member
I don’t know if it’s that simple. In Illinois our governor predicted a surge after Thanksgiving gatherings, but the surge never happened. Instead, the positivity rate has been declining steadily since November 10.

It’s hard for me to believe Illinoisans were better than the citizens of other states in limiting Thanksgiving gatherings. In fact, one poster who lives in a small town said the people there refuse to wear masks or social distance because they hate the governor!
Consider it lucky.
 

Chi84

Premium Member
Yes, but unless you’re gonna begin arresting people having parties or gatherings of more then a couple people in their home (I.e. a legally defined limit)...I don’t know any state willing to go there (yet)
Yes, but at some point we need to acknowledge and respond to reality rather than pontificating on how much better things would be if people didn’t act like people.

The article suggested that states that allowed some level of re-openings (even if they had to close again) may be doing better because they allowed people a bit of relief from several months of restrictions. This made them more willing to comply for the long haul. I don’t know if that’s true or not, but it’s something to consider. It seems pretty obvious that California’s system isn’t working any better than other states’.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Just a little preview of the nationalized health care everyone wants so bad.
One of the reasons there aren't extra supplies of ventilators, masks, PPE, ICU wings is that the capitalized and commercialized for-profit health care system has zero incentive to stockpile (and keep the stockpile 'fresh') in case of emergencies. Privatized health care systems don't profit from such stockpiling. Nor are they required to do so.

However, stockpiling is what governments do since they're supposed to be ready for emergencies and it is bankrolled by the entire population.

But, it is hysterically ironic that you point to a failure in the current for-profit system and claim that's a property of a nationalized system. You really don't see that the thing you're pointing to is evidence of a failure of a privatized health care system? Because, it's proof positive. That you pointed out. Good on you.
 

Jrb1979

Well-Known Member
Yes, but at some point we need to acknowledge and respond to reality rather than pontificating on how much better things would be if people didn’t act like people.

The article suggested that states that allowed some level of re-openings (even if they had to close again) may be doing better because they allowed people a bit of relief from several months of restrictions. This made them more willing to comply for the long haul. I don’t know if that’s true or not, but it’s something to consider. It seems pretty obvious that California’s system isn’t working any better than other states’.
True. People are going to people. Still too many people not taking this seriously and doing things that aren't needed and taking risks that aren't needed. That trip to WDW can wait.
 

Chi84

Premium Member
True. People are going to people. Still too many people not taking this seriously and doing things that aren't needed and taking risks that aren't needed. That trip to WDW can wait.
Yes this we know. I believe it’s been said here somewhere before. I’m just wondering if maybe our leadership can come up with something more creative to motivate people who are at their wits’ end by now.

If you think people are not complying now, telling them that restrictions will continue an indefinite time after the vaccine is widely available is unlikely to produce a better result. Biden seems to understand this - I’m surprised so many people don’t.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom