GoofGoof
Premium Member
It is interesting. If you remember back to May there was a series of discussions around whether WDW should open for locals only since cases were much lower in FL or if they should exclude people from certain states. I think at the time the thought was they would exclude people from NY/NJ area because cases were higher there. We have almost come full circle except FL never really bottomed out on cases like the NE this summer. It would really be better for the country in general if people held off on out of state travel until this wave starts back down.This is setting up to be an.. interesting.. situation that I'm not quite sure if WDW has a plan for: What happens when you have an out of control outbreak elsewhere in the country?
Clearly, if you go by the metrics of Florida or the more local metrics for Orange County, the community spread of the virus - while currently rising - is still well below what it was in July when the parks opened. Fingers can perhaps rightly be pointed at that and say that operations don't need to change, the plan is working, and this can be done safely... and in fact, we're seeing expansion of capacity, slow but steady reopening of closed venues, and a new 'business as a new normal' attitude. All the while, the guest mix has shifted dramatically away from the opening crowds of mostly Florida residents and optimistic DVC owners to a demographic that is alarmingly swinging towards many of the current hot spots.
Should WDW operations change, or even pause again, in light of what's now dramatically happening in its feeder markets?
In addition, WDW may have been an example of 'doing things right', but have they shown any willingness to adapt or react to new developments in our understanding of the spread of the virus? Recent roll-back orders from several state governors hit directly on the now obvious issues we have identified inherent with indoor dining and time spent in crowds indoors (even with mask usage).
There was also a relatively recent CDC guidance change that now indicates the 15 minute 'exposure' guideline should not be interpreted to be in one session. It can be 15 minutes of cumulative exposure, and not necessarily of the same contagious individual. What does that guidance indicate for cast members like servers that are in routine contact with hundreds of unmasked guests throughout the course of a shift?
I had confidence that WDW was taking the right approach to this. A lack of willingness to address some of these newer concerns, along with negative crowding experiences I've personally witnessed at Springs has caused that confidence to begin to waver. I took my 80 year old grandmother to EPCOT back in September. I could not in good conscience recommend that same excursion today.