easyrowrdw
Well-Known Member
Just to clarify those are preprints, some of the detailed posts on this board are better thought out than one preprint you listed,, it is just making interpretations and guesses based on charts and data. Not saying right or wrong but they are not peer reviewed studies etc.
Looks like I missed your edit during my previous response.
You say they're, "just making interpretations and guesses based on charts and data?" That's part of what epidemiologists do. They're building infection models to examine different scenarios. That's not guessing. From the first article: Mathematical modeling has been influential in providing deeper understanding on the transmission mechanisms and burden of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, contributing to the development of public health policy and understanding.
But fine, throw out the third article because it's not through the full peer-review process yet. No problem. What's the rationale for ignoring the other studies that have completed the peer-review process? They also arrive at the same conclusion regarding the effectiveness of masks.