MarkTwain
Well-Known Member
The thing that simultaneously impresses/saddens me the most about Universal's new hotel is how classy and well-themed it manages to be, while still being the "value" option. At Disney's value resorts, you detect a very dramatic difference in the quality of "theming" (if you can call it that) and immersiveness between the value and moderate options. You can quite visibly sense the monetary difference in what you saved by opting for the cheaper option, and frustratingly, can also sense that Disney is talking down to its more budget-eering guests with a louder, dare I say tackier theme.
Meanwhile, Universal provides several excellent amenities that would make them desirable hotels regardless of price point, and all wrapped up in a true and genuine theme that is all at once stylish, fun, and even lightly lightly sophisticated. There is nothing at all tacky about Universal's value hotel; I would go as far to say it reinforces Universal's presence as a leader in thematic design. I wish Disney's value resorts were equally capable of both maintaining a sense of classiness and fun, while being (necessarily) more gently themed than their more deluxe counterparts.
I hope I haven't offended any value enthusiasts; I fully appreciate that Disney's value resorts are a great option for many people and that criticizing them can be a sensitive topic for some. I'm merely talking about their design; not their existence.
I almost wonder, insane as it may sound, if it would be in Universal's best interest to seize onto the increasingly popular split-WDW/Uni vacation model, and offer complimentary resort transport to WDW. Then any such "split" guest looking whether to stay at either WDW or Uni would see that while WDW offers no transit off-property, Uni offers transit to, essentially, everywhere, and that such a vacation would be best off staying at Universal.
Meanwhile, Universal provides several excellent amenities that would make them desirable hotels regardless of price point, and all wrapped up in a true and genuine theme that is all at once stylish, fun, and even lightly lightly sophisticated. There is nothing at all tacky about Universal's value hotel; I would go as far to say it reinforces Universal's presence as a leader in thematic design. I wish Disney's value resorts were equally capable of both maintaining a sense of classiness and fun, while being (necessarily) more gently themed than their more deluxe counterparts.
I hope I haven't offended any value enthusiasts; I fully appreciate that Disney's value resorts are a great option for many people and that criticizing them can be a sensitive topic for some. I'm merely talking about their design; not their existence.
I wonder how many people will shift their model from staying at Disney and visiting UNI.. to staying at UNI and visiting Disney.
Suprised UNI hasn't advertised bundled transportation.. that is probably Disney's biggest 'asset'. Even if it's just a bundled offer, instead of free.. UNI could do heavy damage if guests weren't worried about transportation.
I almost wonder, insane as it may sound, if it would be in Universal's best interest to seize onto the increasingly popular split-WDW/Uni vacation model, and offer complimentary resort transport to WDW. Then any such "split" guest looking whether to stay at either WDW or Uni would see that while WDW offers no transit off-property, Uni offers transit to, essentially, everywhere, and that such a vacation would be best off staying at Universal.