but haven't you noticed a film's staying power has more to do with how much marketing money is thrown at it? Seems like Coco did not get the Toy Story or Frozen treatment... I think they very much control how much a film stays in our consciousness...
Was Ratatouille?Was Coco popular enough for a ride?
Um... Frozen was a no-brainer IP integration? Or did you mean that generally that Frozen deserves to go in the parks (and not Epcot)?Coco is the most culturally-significant Pixar film for certain, it has appeal for adults and children, the soundtrack is outstanding, and most importantly for the Parks, it has holiday tie-in. Probably the most no-brainer IP integration since Frozen.
Coco's popularity in China is also something that has occurred to me as making an attraction potentially more likely. The fact that they are building a Zootopia land there after ignoring it in the US parks shows that they are paying attention to what films have particularly hit with the Chinese market. As Coco was a huge hit for them there (Pixar's biggest, I think), it would be a natural candidate for an attraction. Sharing the costs across the resorts could help this make more sense financially.-The film is also, strangely, quite popular in China! Adventure Isle in Shanghai Disneyland has been overlayed with a Coco theme for Halloween for several years and has run several weeks past the rest of the Halloween event as well. The possibility to insert this ride in Adventure Isle would be easy: the land is already a psuedo-Pandora heavily influenced by a mythical culture of spirit animals and guardians of the earth, sea, land, and air. Adventure Isle obviously has a strong connection with the spirit world. Sandwiching a mini-land between Treasure Cove and Adventure Isle would be an ideal spot for the attraction. Knowing Disney, it would be hard to pass up a triple-clone of an attraction.
PatF generally is a perfect example of a film that has lived on far beyond what the initial box office of the film would have suggested. In this case, the debate we're having about Coco is different in that everyone acknowledges it was a hit whereas PatF was considered a bit of a flop at the box office. The fact that Coco's presence only seems to be growing in the parks suggests that Disney similarly sees this as having an enduring appeal.Tiana seems to be on the same trajectory. She may not get her own ride, but her presence becomes more and more noticeable (dedicated M&G, featured in the new DVC, featured in HEA, her restaurant on the cruise ship, etc...).
Yeah that's what I meant. Should have specified.Or did you mean that generally that Frozen deserves to go in the parks (and not Epcot)?
What "Later" are they saving things for? The parks have languished for decades...they need to just get in there and get it all done...
If they wanted to put anything off it should have been the EPCOT spine project....which will add absolutely nothing to your EPCOT experience... Attractions are needed...not more blank green space and rentable party venues.
quite popular here among my students....Anyway.
Yes, Coco was a popular movie
Especially in the west coast, if the ride does indeed go to DCA.
Coco's popularity at the Disneyland Resort is something no other non-princess movie has come close to in the last decade
A movie that celebrates an entire culture and seasonal holiday has a built-in long-lasting appeal (especially in socal)
Where? Almost nothing has been added or announced after the film left theaters 2 years ago...Coco's presence become more pronounced in the parks.
Where? Almost nothing has been added or announced after the film left theaters 2 years ago...
I said after it left theaters but apparently you missed that. Also seasonal attractions which started during the initial release don't count as new.In WDW, first, the merch in the Mexico pavilion. Then the mariachi make their fall set all about Coco. Then they added the Día de los Muertos display with an interactive feature to Mexico. Then they added the Miguel puppet for the Fall mariachi set. Coco gets a big section in the new projection show at DHS.
Over at DCA, they got an even longer Coco Día de los Muertos party with full sized puppets. Then their own party section was supersized.
Each year, something new gets added. I really don't know how you could have missed all of that.
While I rarely see Brave merchandise being worn at DLR (the occasional princess dress), I do see Coco apparel on guests every day. And the live show performed around Halloween-Time is still well attended. Coco may not have staying power elsewhere but it certainly does here.I have. And Coco seems to be like Brave. Yes, people liked it, but the overall appeal just didn’t seem to have a powerful impact.
I said after it left theaters but apparently you missed that. Also seasonal attractions which started during the initial release don't count as new.
It didn't. But then again they were "shocked" Frozen was so popular, weren't they?
Coco's more popular than some realize I think. Especially as others have said, at DCA. But I've also seen large crowds show up for the Coco show in Epcot (that they dumped, then briefly brought back). I don't think merch is flying off the shelves though for it. So I imagine that plays a factor. I also think they didn't want to allocate the budget right now for such a large overhaul of Mexico while everything else is going on. It makes sense to save it for later, along with Figment and other things.
"Nightmare Before Christmas during halloween and christmas doesn't count"Those things showed up after it left theaters. Making up the rule "but seasonal doesn't count" is silly.
Part of the reason merch isn't flying is because it sucks for Coco. As a white person in the Northeast, Coco is one of my I favorite movies of all time. But because of cultural appropriation, I can't go around with a bunch of sugar skulls. I have searched for merch of Pepita, and have found almost nothing. They can do better if they wanted to.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.