The Grand Inquisitor
Well-Known Member
I loved Coco! It's one of the best Pixar movies in my opinion. One of the most recent Pixar movies to make me cry during the scene with Coco singing to his great grandma. Coco definitely deserves a ride!
*MiguelI loved Coco! It's one of the best Pixar movies in my opinion. One of the most recent Pixar movies to make me cry during the scene with Coco singing to his great grandma. Coco definitely deserves a ride!
I meant Miguel*Miguel
I bet it would replace the mexico pavilion ride.Maybe they will do it as an overlay of the Haunted Mansion.
They could do an attraction with Coco. Mexico is the most likely location.
A Ratatouille ride is the digestive systemA Coco ride is a hearse.
Too soon?
It's not silly because it's the same exact event every year since it was introduced with little to no changes, so by legal definition it is not new. Attractions, shows and events that are over 18 months old can no longer be labeled as new because it is technically false advertising. So until you can give me a solid example of something that has opened after the film left theaters that's not just a seasonal show your point is still invalid. Good day sir.Those things showed up after it left theaters. Making up the rule "but seasonal doesn't count" is silly.
Exactly, IP CAN work in Epcot, Imagineers know what their doingI actually would be ok with the idea. But, as others have stated, I hope it's a ride about Dios de Los Muertos. That could be a wonderful way to use Coco and it's characters to be about something Mexican. And something you could do the in time the ride allows.
It’s not their decision.Exactly, IP CAN work in Epcot, Imagineers know what their doing
It’s not their decision.
That's the most frustrating part. Imagineering is best when it's set free...
Aren't the cost overruns on Imagineering's rap sheet for their financial... freedoms?
That is a fair point, I did not account for inflation in my prior post. Coco comes next to last domestically of the non-sequel Pixar films when adjusted for inflation. It performed 25% less than the adjusted domestic average and almost 18% less than the adjusted domestic median.Coco was actually one of the weaker performers in the US market. It did well worldwide but doesn't hold up domestically to older, non-sequel, Pixar Films like UP or Rat when you take inflation into consideration.
Here are the breakdown of Pixar films takings:
Disney-Pixar Production Company Box Office History - The Numbers
Disney-Pixar production company box office earningsm.the-numbers.com
That said, I don't see why they wouldn't do this attraction. Makes a lot more sense to do it for many more reasons than just comparing it's performance at the box office.
It’s been a good while since Disney built anything budget friendly.or we could get what we are getting now...budget friendly designs that fail to impress...Hello Riviera!
It’s been a good while since Disney built anything budget friendly.
That is a fair point, I did not account for inflation in my prior post. Coco comes next to last domestically of the non-sequel Pixar films when adjusted for inflation. It performed 25% less than the adjusted domestic average and almost 18% less than the adjusted domestic median.
That being said, I have my suspicions as to why it comparatively underperformed here, and I don't believe those domestic market forces would have an impact on getting a ride built. Afterall, the #1 and 2 adjusted domestic non-sequel Pixar films are currently only represented by a much-derided show (Monsters Inc Laugh Floor) and a meet-and-greet (Joy and Sadness from Inside Out) at WDW.
Since WDW gets so many international guests, Worldwide gross is still the best proxy for how a Coco ride would be received, esp in World Showcase. Adjusted for inflation, Coco is the #5 non-sequel Pixar film worldwide.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.